By: Ida V. Eskamani, Senior Director of Legislative Affairs at State Innovation Exchange
This May Day, or International Workers Day, SiX's Economic Justice Initiative proudly recognized the nearly 100 state legislators across the country who signed the #Listen2Workers pledge, a public commitment to elevate the voices and policy agenda of workers in their districts.
The #Listen2Workers campaign is a collaborative initiative led by End Poverty in California (EPIC) and the State Innovation Exchange (SiX), alongside partners like SEIU California, Southern Economic Advancement Project and Caring Across Generations, to amplify the stories of workers, highlight state legislators who elevate workers in policymaking, and demonstrate what’s possible when workers and state legislators work in collaboration towards brighter futures. To participate, legislators signed a formal pledge committing to listen to working communities, record interviews with workers in their districts, and introduce legislation that reflects the actual needs and struggles shared by those workers.
To learn more about how states are championing workers, join us for a briefing: State Strategies to Build Worker Power. The meeting will cover how every state can solve the affordability crisis by building a pro-worker economy, and share successful case studies across the country states can adapt, from resourcing worker centers, strengthening unions, and enabling worker ownership. This briefing is open to legislators and legislative staff.
Why State Leadership Matters More Than Ever in Public Health
Why State Leadership Matters More Than Ever in Public Health
By: Geran Tarr, Former Alaska State Representative, SiX consultant
In December 2024, a month after the presidential election and in conjunction with the SiX National Conference, SiX took 15 state legislators to visit the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta. Fifteen months of the second Trump Administration later and looking towards National Public Health Week April 6-10, it is hard to process how much has changed.
The nation’s public health infrastructure has been gutted, with disastrous effects that will take decades to fully understand. Staff have departed key health agencies, including the CDC and Department of Health and Human Services, over questionable public health decisions not grounded in scientific evidence, and the public is now left wondering what and who to believe.
During our 2024 visit, we learned from public health experts about the critical role the CDC plays in protecting public health, from securing talented advisors to establish evidence-based vaccine policy (all of whom have now been dismissed and replaced) to preventing mass outbreaks of illness through intricate surveillance programs and so much more. We learned that 90% of CDC funds are returned to states for public health needs. The CDC is just one federal public health agency under attack from the current administration. Given all of this, state legislators' role in public health has shifted, giving them more responsibility in protecting their constituents.
Across the country, state legislators and the communities they represent are feeling the deep impacts of the federal budget cuts and dismantling of critical public health infrastructure, particularly in rural areas. For National Public Health Week, we’re highlighting some of the ways that legislators are organizing, strategizing and stepping up to protect public health through policy that brings together agriculture, food, rural, and health issues including on toxics and pesticides policy, food access policy, and infrastructure and rural health access policy.
Pesticides and Toxics
For three sessions running, Midwestern and Southern states have been battlegrounds for a controversial pesticide immunity bill. The so-called Bayer bill (also known as “Cancer-Gag” or “Failure to Warn”) would prevent farmers, workers, and families from taking legal action if they suspected an illness like cancer was the result of pesticide use.
Why are these deeply unpopular bills being pushed in states? In a David vs. Goliath scenario unfolding in courtrooms across the country, farmers and rural residents with cancer have been successfully suing chemical giants like Bayer and Syngenta for making them sick. A great deal of evidence points to links between Bayer’s Roundup herbicide (with the active ingredient glyphosate) and cancer and Syngenta’s paraquat and Parkinson’s disease. After paying millions of dollars in lawsuits, these companies have taken a different tack: passing state legislation to prohibit lawsuits. State legislators are stopping these bad corporate actors and holding them accountable for making farmers sick. In Iowa, for example, SiX's Cohort for Rural Opportunity and Prosperity (CROP) member State Representative Megan Srinivas, a physician, held cancer listening sessions to surface community health concerns from rural Iowans, including concerns about the Bayer bill. Other toxics and pesticides policy where state legislators are leading includes addressing PFAS contamination, removing toxic metals in baby foods, and bans on chemicals in foods, personal care products, and agriculture, including proposed bans on paraquat due to its links with Parkinson’s.
Hunger and Food Access
As the federal government took a hatchet to federal SNAP funding and food programming in 2025, state legislators across the country worked hard to fill the “SNAP gaps” created by federal actions, food price inflation, and program changes that will limit access, like instating a work requirement for SNAP benefits. Food is a basic need and without proper nutrition our communities suffer. State legislators recognize the critical importance of food access in building and maintaining health communities, which is why policymakers are creating new and innovative programs to fund free and reduced school lunch programs, expanding access to fresh, healthy foods, and partnering with farmers to expand their reach. These state-funded programs can operate independently of the federal government, securing food access for their neighbors. With recent estimates showing the cuts to SNAP could lead to 70,000 avoidable deaths and the current federal government showdown resulting in delays in receiving food benefits, these are just the most recent examples of how critical state actions are in protecting communities from the impacts of federal actions.
Systemic disinvestment in rural America has been happening over decades, aided by inadequate state and federal policy that leaves rural communities behind, and won't be fixed overnight. However, with state legislators leading the way and creating a proactive and positive vision for rural public health through co-governance based rural organizing, we know that positive change can be lasting.
The theme for this year’s National Public Health Week is Ready. Set. Action! and state legislators are showing they are ready to lead on public health and already are taking action. Let’s applaud and uplift the important public health work of our state legislators! Happy National Public Health Week 2026!
State Power to Protect our Farmers, Food, and Rural Communities.
State Power to Protect our Farmers, Food, and Rural Communities.
By: Kendra Kimbirauskas
The agricultural community has long been the backbone of our economy, but recent Trump administration policy decisions have placed unprecedented strain on farmers and rural communities across the country. In light of these actions—particularly the use of executive orders and the systematic dismantling of federal agencies—state legislators must be well-informed about the direct and indirect impacts on their states. These actions often create policy gaps, regulatory challenges, and funding shifts that significantly affect state governance.
The unprecedented decisions have had a significant impact on farmers and rural communities. Navigating these changes has been challenging, from the instability caused by tariffs to the USDA's cancellation of $1 billion in funding for local food purchasing programs that support schools and food banks. Additionally, funding freezes and plans to eliminate the EPA’s environmental justice offices have further compounded these difficulties. These decisions will have direct, serious, and long-lasting consequences for working families, with communities of color, rural populations, farmers, and farmworkers bearing the heaviest burden. However, this moment also presents an opportunity for state legislators to step up and take action in response to these challenges.
Content summarized from our rural communities, farmers, and our food briefing as part of our bi-weekly federal rapid response series. Legislators and legislative staff can register here for this ongoing series.
The Growing Uncertainty in Rural Communities
The federal funding freeze has left farmers and rural people with a wave of uncertainty across the rural landscape. USDA local offices closing, employees being laid off, and critical conservation programs frozen have left farmers without the support they rely on. Contracts that were once secured are now uncertain, causing financial strain and distress. Many fear that these cuts will accelerate trends of farm consolidation, pushing out small and mid-sized family farms and favoring large agribusinesses.
The ripple effects of these policy changes extend far beyond individual farms. Community banks, rural businesses, and local economies are all feeling the pressure. Tariff threats and shifting market conditions have only exacerbated the situation, creating a "whiplash effect" that makes long-term planning nearly impossible for many farmers.
The Threat to Equity in Agriculture
There are deeply concerning effects of recent executive orders that have targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives within the USDA. These rollbacks are not just policy shifts but direct attacks on 40 years of the civil rights movement’s progress in agriculture. There have been harmful dog whistles and lies about these advances coming at the expense of white farmers. This false narrative is intended to undermine civil rights and interracial solidarity between family farm organizations, like the National Farmers Union, with predominantly white members, and those organizations working directly in communities with farmers of color. The result of these actions has been chilling and profound for community-based organizations. Many serve the most vulnerable farmers, who are now facing threats, seeing grant funds being delayed or withheld, and are being silenced by the fear of retaliation.
Additionally, the elimination of the Local Food Purchasing Program is resulting in funds being withheld that would have otherwise gone to food programs for purchasing local healthy foods directly from local farmers. This action is causing harm to the most vulnerable farmers and the communities that they serve.
Furthermore, these funding cuts and regulatory rollbacks are having a significant mental health impact on farmers. With Medicaid rollbacks occurring simultaneously, farmers are left without critical safety nets, compounding their daily stress and uncertainty.
Dismantling USAID’s impact on farmers and rural communities
While the future of the agency hangs with the courts, it is currently not operating on a day-to-day basis, which has led to layoffs and disruptions in critical food supply chains globally while impacting farmers here at home.
Representative Sonya Harper (IL) is Fighting Back
In mid-March, Representative Sonya Harper, who chairs the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Committee, held a hearing to uplift the stories of farmers who were being harmed by the Trump administration’s funding freeze. With a forum to lift up the voices of those most impacted, advocates were able to quickly mobilize their members to share stories. This hearing garnered considerable media attention and highlighted the severe repercussions of the USDA’s decision to remove funding for critical programs such as the Illinois Eats Program and the Resilient Food Systems Program. These cuts, coupled with mass layoffs at the USDA and looming threats of tariffs, have created economic uncertainty and disruption for many farmers across the state. Additionally, the closure of key research institutions like the Peoria Ag Lab and the termination of federal agreements, such as those funding the Soybean Innovation Lab, have only added to the instability.
Rep. Harper’s hearing underscored the real-world impacts of these decisions—farmers struggling to stay afloat, food banks unable to provide fresh produce, and conservation programs left in limbo.
Actions Legislators can take
Regardless of whether urban or rural, state legislators have an opportunity to use their platform to raise awareness of how Trump administration policies and actions are impacting farmers and rural communities while directly threatening the food security of so many Americans. Immediate action legislators can take:
Host a hearing: If you are a legislator in a position to request that your state’s equivalent of an agriculture committee hold an information hearing on how farmers feel about Trump administration policies, this can be a powerful forum to lift up the voices of those directly harmed. If you are unable to get an official hearing through your state’s agriculture committee, host an unofficial hearing at a local business or a public library and work with your local food and farming community to invite farmers and the media.
Introduce a resolution: Use your power in the legislature to call on the Trump administration to reinstate the funding to support farmers, food for schools, and reinstate USAID as a way to support farmers and rural communities in your state.
Write an Op-ed: Use your voice to tell the stories of the farmers, farm workers, universities, or rural communities that are impacted by the Trump administration policies. Continue to make visible the consequences of federal action at a local level.
Advocate for state-level policies: Continue to be a champion for state-level policies that support farmers and build resilient food systems. Stay in relationships and connected with community partners (outside of the corporate ag lobby), and continue to advocate for organizations working to support farmers of color in your state. Collaborate with tax advocates and allied Ways & Means legislators to identify new forms of sustainable revenue in your state.
Relevant Resources:
If you have farmer constituents experiencing stress, here are some resources for them. (Note this is currently housed on a USDA site. It would be a good idea to download and file this document in the event it disappears)
Use these graphics to lift up the impacts that the elimination of USAID has caused to your state. Use these graphics to tell the story of how your state’s universities will be affected by losing resources from the program.
Keep this resource handy from our partner Dãnia Davy, who has been holding office hours about the funding freeze called What the Funding?!?!
Keep up to date on recent Trump administration actions and the impact to food and farming by bookmarking Civil Eats’ Policy Tracker.
The SiX Ag team has been following some of the recent federal administration’s actions in our CROP HOT Takes emails. You can find more information here. Additionally, we’ve created several new toolkits on dangerous state policy trends this session including on the pesticide preemption “Bayer” bills and the impacts of the Immigration Executive Orders on farmworkers. With the extreme attacks on DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives, we’ve also compiled a messaging toolkit for state legislators to support Black farmers.
New Series: Federal Rapid Response Strategy Sessions
New Series: Federal Rapid Response Strategy Sessions
In light of the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration—particularly the use of executive orders and the systematic dismantling of federal agencies—state legislators must be well-informed about the direct and indirect impacts on their states and how to respond. These actions often leave gaps in policies, create new challenges, and shift funding, which can make things harder for state governments.
To help state lawmakers stay informed and ready, SiX and State Futures are hosting bi-weekly Federal Rapid Response Rooms. These virtual meetings give state leaders the tools, strategies, and support they need to respond to federal changes and, when possible, push back.
In these sessions, state legislators and policy experts come together to talk about new federal actions, figure out how they affect states, and plan ways to respond. The goal is to make sure states aren't just reacting to federal decisions but are also creating their own strategies and a proactive vision for the future.
State legislators and staff, click here to join us for our next Federal Rapid Response Room!
So far we have covered:
Executive Orders and State Impact
Federal actions can quickly change state funding and priorities. This first session gave lawmakers important information about these fast-moving decisions, their impacts on states, and how to respond. Experts like Somil Trivedi from Democracy Forward and Michigan Senate Leader Winnie Brinks shared their insights. Lawmakers also joined small group discussions to talk about challenges, solutions, and ways to work together across states. The meeting wrapped up with a summary, helpful resources, and next steps.
State Power to Protect Public Schools
Florida Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost, the Education Law Center, and North Carolina State House Representative Lindsey Prather joined this session to talk about public education. Access to education is directly tied to economic and political power — and public education wasn’t handed to us, it was fought for. But for decades, there’s been a strong, well-funded push to privatize schools.
Click here for a recap of the public education session.
Agriculture, Rural Communities, and Food
The Trump administration’s latest moves are already hitting farmers, rural communities, and our food system. In this session, expert speakers broke down what’s happening, how it’s affecting farms and families in rural areas, and what it all means for the future of agriculture and food.
Click here for a recap of the rural communities, farmers, and our food briefing.
Federal + State Regulatory Attacks and State Response
In this session, experts and lawmakers covered DOGE, efforts to weaken federal regulatory agencies, state-level DOGE actions, and positive state responses.
Rapid Response: Social Safety Net Programs
In this session, we focused on Medicaid and social safety nets. Read more about defending Medicaid here.
NEW VIDEO: SiX's Agriculture and Food Systems Program
NEW VIDEO: SiX's Agriculture and Food Systems Program
Our rural, agriculture, and food systems programming is a cornerstone of the work that we do here at SiX.
In this new video, Kendra Kimbirauskas, senior director of agriculture & food systems talks about the importance of this work and why state legislators have the opportunity to be leaders in advancing rural, agriculture, and food systems policy that not only is good for people, the planet, rural communities and animals, but also advances economic and reproductive justice and our democratic values.
State lawmakers can be powerful advocates for change, and this video highlights the importance of their leadership in advancing a more just and sustainable future for everyone.
This interview is based on responses from a tweet chat that took place on April 28, 2021. Answers have been lightly edited for clarity.
What experiences shaped your understanding of the importance of agriculture?
Sen. Kim Jackson (GA): As a sixth-generation Black farmer, I think about agriculture every day when I do farm chores! I raise goats, bees, ducks, and chickens and all kinds of vegetables. And, I eat food every day!
Rep. Brian Turner (NC): My grandma grew up in the mountain border of North Carolina & Tennessee. Raising livestock & planting row crops were a way of life for her. I’m grateful she passed those skills to me, and now I get to pass it on to my daughter growing our own veggies in the backyard.
Rep. Rebecca Mitchell (GA): At first: a square baler without a kicker. Loading 50- and 100-pound feed sacks at the mill. Outdoor water spigots in the winter in New York. Fiberglass fence posts (never. ever. again).
Later: working at the dairy farm next door. Fitting sheep at shows.
Professionally: ambulatory rotations in veterinary school and analyzing milk quality and pathogens from dairy farms.
Rep. Julie von Haefen (NC): Growing up in Iowa, I saw firsthand how agriculture can be an integral part of the economy, our community and our environment. My house was on the edge of a cornfield and detasseling corn was the premier summer job for teenagers!
Agriculture issues range from food insecurity to soil health—what are some of the agriculture issues in your district?
Sen. Natalie Murdock (NC): Food insecurity is an issue in my senate district. 16.5% of people in my county are food insecure, that’s over 45,000 people. Over 12,000 children are food insecure.
Rep. Julie von Haefen (NC): We don’t have a lot of farms, but urban agriculture is becoming more important! Urban farming is the practice of cultivating, processing, and distributing food in or around urban areas—an important tool to ensure our communities have access to fresher and healthier foods!
Sen. Rosemary Bayer (MI): My district spans a wide array of urban, suburban and rural areas. While we don’t have much farming in the district anymore, soil as a vital living system is important to all of us. From large rural farms to urban gardens, we all need healthy soil! Constituents all over the state & my district suffer from food insecurity and Covid has only made this worse. In addition to sustainable farming across the state, local sustainable urban and suburban gardens can help with food insecurity.
Sen. Kim Jackson (GA): In District 41, like many places in Georgia, people struggle with food insecurity. And for folks growing food in the city—often to address this very issue!—there can be many roadblocks.
I'm encouraged by efforts to bring fresh food to more people and support new growers. We need collaboration across sectors—and at all levels of government!—to decrease barriers to healthy food and urban agriculture.
Agriculture and the environment go hand in hand.
Tell us about an agriculture, food, or rural issue you are working on in your state.
Sen. Kim Jackson (GA): I serve on the Senate Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee. I'm working to support Black farmers across the state of Georgia and bring fresh, healthy food to those who need it most.
Rep. Brian Turner (NC): As a member of the Ag appropriations committee I’m working to make sure the preservation programs are funded and also fighting for improved broadband penetration so farmers can modernize, be more efficient, and so kids know they can farm and be connected.
Sen. Kirk deViere (NC): I’ve been fortunate enough to connect with veterans who have turned to farming as a career and therapy for post-military life. We have a responsibility to help and encourage small family farms that have been the cornerstone of North Carolina’s agricultural economy for generations. I’d like to see veteran farmers as a substantial part of those small farms.
A farmer's market in Clayton, North Carolina
How can agriculture be part of the solution to climate change?
Sen. Kirk deViere (NC): Incentivizing sustainable farming and regenerative agriculture is not only a smart long-term policy decision for farmers, but it’s much better for our environment as well. To be successful, agriculture must be a significant focus of climate justice.
Sen. Natalie Murdock (NC): As a previous soil and water supervisor, I know how soil health is key to combating climate change. Here in North Carolina we continue to work on robust soil health plans and need to fund regenerative agriculture programs.
Rep. Brian Turner (NC): Farmers love the land they work and want to keep it healthy so they can grow our food. Creating incentives to reduce fertilizers, stormwater runoff, and adopt more efficient irrigation tech helps. For more about local food growers visit the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Remember, what you put into the air and ground travels. It’s never just about our own gardens or backyards. We are a world community.
What do you wish more people knew about agriculture?
Rep. Julie von Haefen (NC): Agriculture and the environment go hand in hand. We must pay attention to how our North Carolina hog and poultry farms are operating and affecting the communities around them, and how they may be harmful to water and air.
Creating policy that benefits and protects both agriculture and the environment is important.
Sen. Kirk deViere (NC): One common misconception about agriculture is that all farmers are white. This couldn’t be further from the truth. As of 2017, North Carolina had nearly 2,100 black producers. We rely on minority farmers, namely Black farmers.
Rep. Brian Turner (NC): Agriculture is the #1 driver of North Carolina’s economy. We are #1 in the U.S. in sweet potatoes and soybeans, #2 in hogs.
Agriculture is bipartisan with rural and urban support. Most North Carolina farms are small family operations hoping the next generation will take over. We have a duty to help. No farms, no food.
How can people engage with agriculture issues beyond Earth Month?
Rep. Julie von Haefen: Contact your state legislators and sign up for our legislative updates! Sharing your priorities with your elected officials goes a long way towards advancing sound environmental and agricultural policies.
Sen. Kirk deViere (NC): If you live in North Carolina, you likely interact with agriculture much more than you realize. After all, agriculture is our #1 industry! It’s up to us to make sure that we continue to support the agricultural industry while fighting climate change.
Sen. Rosemary Bayer (MI): We all need to be conscious of good environmental practices – in pest management, water management, air and soil health and more. Remember, what you put into the air and ground travels. It’s never just about our own gardens or backyards. We are a world community. We have one planet and we need to work together to protect not only our own land, state and country, but our entire planet.
Farm and Food Chain Workers: Equity and Justice in the Food System
SiX Main Takeaways
Farmworkers make up just one link of the food supply chain—there's also processing, distribution, retail, and restaurant and service workers. In total, 21.5 million people are food chain workers in this country. Policies should take into account all types of food chain workers.
Food and farmworkers are some of the lowest-paid and exploited workers in the country because they are not covered by many federal labor laws. State legislators can fill in the gaps where the federal system has failed.
Protecting food workers means more than just raising wages because workers are also endangered by heat, toxic chemical exposure, substandard housing, COVID-19, smoke from wildfires, and more. Some states have already passed bills to address these problems.
Even in states with progressive legislatures, large growers and other agricultural interests have a lot of influence at the state house. Changing the system requires buy-in from a variety of stakeholders.
The best policies will come from including farm and food workers at the table. These are skilled laborers and they know what policies are necessary.
National grassroots coalitions can help connect legislators to farm and food worker organizations in every state. SiX can help connect you!
COVID Resources: Food Systems and Agriculture
Covid-19 demonstrated that the corporate food supply chain is one crisis away from failing, which puts communities at risk of being food insecure and could cause barriers for local farmers working to address the food needs of their community.
In order to ensure that communities are resilient in their ability to access food during a crisis, legislators should work to ensure that there is a sound regional and/or local alternative food supply chain with a plan to get food to those who need it while also ensuring that food and farm workers are adequately protected in their workplaces.
Resources
Support for Farmers
Appropriate additional funds for their agriculture community. Here are bills from Vermont and North Carolina and Utah.
Appropriate additional resources for farm safety, rural mental health and farm crisis services. Here is what Minnesota has done.
Include small independent farmers in any small business aid like this bill from New York did.
Local Food Infrastructure
Designate farmer's markets as essential local service providers. Here's a list of states that have done this.
Provide opportunities for increased local meat infrastructure. Oregon, North Carolina, New Mexico, Hawaii,Utah, Wyoming have all been working on bills to bolster local meat production to service small and independent farmers who are providing meat for their local communities.
Create working groups to assess food security and a local food supply to bolster community resiliency. New York and Utah have both done this.
Food Security
Use new flexibility in SNAP to respond to COVID-19 challenges. Here is an overview of what states can do and here is what New Jersey did to increase access to SNAP benefits.
Provide additional resources for food access, particularly to underserved communities. Here is one example from Minnesota. Mississippi attempted a bill to include reimbursements to local municipalities for a variety of services including food delivery to senior citizens and other vulnerable populations. Pennsylvania has a bill that includes resources for a food hotline, food banks and additional SNAP benefits.
Provide additional support for Food Pantries. Here is what Colorado did and North Carolina appropriated additional funds as part of an omnibus package to be split equally among food banks.
Provide grants to local organizations to purchase local food (this helps farmers too). An example from Minnesota.
Provide emergency food assistance to undocumented persons like California did.
Allow school buses to use the eight-light system when making food deliveries to families with school-aged children, as was done in Vermont.
Farm & Food Worker Safety
Appropriate funds for farmers to purchase PPE for farm and food workers. See this bill from New Jersey.
Ensure that state information related to farm worker safety is communicated in both Spanish and English. Here is what Vermont did and this is the bill being considered in California.
Floridians Want State Lawmakers to Act on Threats Created by COVID Crisis
Strong support for progressive solutions to help working families and ensure the elections are accessible and safe
A recent poll commissioned by the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) shows Florida voters hold deep concerns over the risk that COVID-19 poses to their health and the impact on the economy and the election. Two in three Floridians believe the worst of the pandemic is yet to come (65%).
The Role of Government in Issues Facing Florida
When asked if the state government should play a role in some of the issues facing working families, voters overwhelmingly supported government engagement in:
Safely and fairly administering elections (92%);
Stopping the spread of the coronavirus (90%);
Ensuring equal access to high-quality K-12 education (89%);
Ensuring struggling families and children have access to food (84%); and
Equal pay for equal work (81%).
Voters Support Steps to Ensure Safe and Accessible Elections
Florida voters overwhelmingly believe that the state government has a role to play in safely and fairly administering elections (92%). The majority of Floridians report that they will vote by mail (52%). However, 47% still plan to vote in person, with 27% planning to vote on Election Day and 20% planning to early vote.
Whether or not they are choosing to vote in person or by-mail, voters supported policies to ensure the election is safe and accessible for all eligible voters:
Open additional polling locations to reduce crowds and lines (84%);
Lengthen the window for early voting and allow voters to cast ballots in person up through the day before Election Day (82%);
Allow any registered Florida voter to cast a ballot at any polling location in their county (71%); and
Mail all registered voters applications to vote-by-mail (61%).
Voters Concerned about COVID Impact and Strongly Support Progressive Economic Policies
By a four to one margin voters believe Florida state government should invest more in its residents to ensure they are safe, healthy, and economically secure (64%) rather than state government keeping taxes low and cutting funds to key services like education, infrastructure and unemployment insurance (16%).
Florida has been hard hit by the pandemic with one in three of Floridians responding that they have been laid off or had their hours cut (34%). Two out of three Floridians support extending and expanding unemployment for those workers who have been laid off (65%). Support for this policy cuts across partisan lines with Democrats (78%), Republicans (52%) Independents (65%) in favor.
The pandemic is a top of mind concern for Floridians who report they are concerned about the people losing work and income due to the virus (84%), small businesses and restaurants closing down permanently (84%), Floridians contracting the virus and dying (79%), people of Florida unable to afford their rent or mortgage (79%) and people in Florida being forced to choose between their health and their job (71%).
Given the current crisis, Floridians support policies that will address the hardships being faced by many and make life easier for working families:
Providing low-interest loans to small businesses to help them make it through the crisis (94%);
Extending the grace period for people to pay health insurance bills before their coverage can be canceled (88%);
Limiting what drug companies can charge for prescription drugs (87%);
Offering people in Florida the option to buy into the same public health insurance plans that are available to state employees if they want to (86%); and
Banning the practice of surprise medical billing (85%).
