fbpx

New Maine Focus Group Results Show Support for Progressive Ideas from the Legislature

Recently concluded focus groups built on polling conducted last year and reveal Mainers strongly support many of the policies the state legislature has recently passed or considered with residents most supportive of legislation to make prescription drugs more affordable, ones that will hold pharmaceutical companies accountable for the opioid crisis, and establishing more protections for workers.

As the 2019 legislative session came to a close, SiX commissioned Lincoln Park Strategies to conduct a poll to gauge voters’ feelings on the progress of the legislative session. To build on that knowledge, SiX commissioned focus groups of Mainers prior to the 2020 legislative session to gauge swing residents’ feelings about the state’s future and their views on the legislative leadership’s policy agenda. One thing is clear: Mainers are looking for solutions to their everyday problems and largely support the progressive ideas the legislature has passed and considered. 

Mainers are most worried about issues around healthcare, especially access to quality and affordable care, the cost of prescription drugs, and opioid abuse.

Voters are also very worried about job opportunities in the state, the cost of higher education, property taxes, income tax fairness, access to quality education, and climate change.

See analysis here and results here.

Action on Health Care Affordability Is a Top Priority for Coloradans

Voters Support Health Care Reforms and Tax Savings for Working Families

A recent poll conducted by Strategies 360 for the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) shows that voters strongly support progressive solutions to make health care more affordable and put more money in the pockets of working people.

Health Care

The skyrocketing cost of health care and prescription drugs remains a top issue for Colorado residents. The findings highlight that progressive policy solutions like limiting hospital profit margins, increasing competition in the health care market, and capping prescription drug costs would make a real difference for Colorado families.

Economic Issues

Voters continue to support measures that expand tax savings for low- and middle-income families. There is robust support for the state to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit, which would provide desperately needed economic relief for families making less than $75,000 per year.

For the polling on health care and economic issues, see results here. For analysis on the health care results see here.

Survey Methodology: Strategies 360 conducted a survey of 600 registered voters in Colorado from January 2-5, 2020. Interviews were conducted on landlines and cell phones. The margin of error for a survey of 600 interviews is ±4.0% at the 95% confidence level; error is higher among subgroups.

For Second Year in a Row, Health Care Tops the List of Issues Floridians Want the State Legislature to Act Upon

A recent poll commissioned by the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) shows Floridians are concerned about health care and other pocketbook economic issues.  Polling demonstrates strong support for progressive policy solutions to these challenges facing Florida families.

Voters Support Action on Health Care 

Florida voters prioritize action on health care with a focus on affordability. On a scale of 1 to 100, voters supported policies to: 

Voters Want Action on Pocketbook Economic Policies

Floridians reject trickle down economics and strongly support progressive policies that put money back in the pockets of working people.  

Click here to see the poll memo.
Click here to see the presentation on results.

The State Innovation Exchange commissioned TargetSmart to complete the research.  The survey was conducted in December 2019 with 892 respondents.

Our 10 Favorite Moments from State Legislatures this Year

2019 was a big year in state legislatures. Important battles to strengthen our democracy, improve the lives of working families, advance reproductive freedom, defend civil rights, and protect the environment were won and lost in states across the nation. These battles impact the lives of Americans every day, yet so many of these stories never reached the eyes or ears of most Americans. There are too many legislative victories to include in a list like this, so below are ten of our favorite moments of legislators standing up for their values. 

Note: When looking back over the year, we did not screen for gender, and yet women took center stage. More women are running for office than ever before, yet still make up just 28.7% of state legislators. But as you’ll see below, these women are making an impact. 

1. Women Took Charge in NV with the First Female-Majority Legislature in the Nation

Nevada became the first state in the nation’s history where women outnumbered men in the state legislature. More people of color were in Nevada’s legislature this session too, and all of these new voices in the legislature shaped which issues were discussed and which become policy. “I think growing up, you have this idea that politicians aren’t us. They don’t look like me. They don’t have my type of hair. They don’t come from our background. They don’t have to send money back to El Salvador to make sure that their family can make ends meet,” Assemblywoman Selena Torres said in an interview with the Washington Post. “But then you come to realize: That’s the problem.”

VZTacCJRItN1upOKynCK Zhba2iJybd1E0 pvuvc9FZDnv 7pDodSwqM1biK9JZ 31UKeHrH1A5MYjqSkdGVzRS7bMRVUcuVXuVm60V6lFgN1R N6W73

2. When OR Rep. Tiffiny Mitchell Donated A Kidney to a Stranger 

This year, Oregon Rep. Tiffiny Mitchell donated her kidney to a stranger, survived a conservative recall attempt, and worked on legislation to include protections for organ donors under Oregon’s just-passed Paid Family and Medical Leave law, one of the most progressive leave policies in the nation. While Rep. Mitchell didn’t benefit from the law for her own surgery--the law goes into effect in 2020--she hopes her process and the passage of this bill inspires more people to consider becoming a donor. 2019 was also a huge year for paid family and medical leave progress in the states. Connecticut joined Oregon and also passed a new statewide law; California and New Jersey expanded their paid leave laws.

3. NC State Representative Deb Butler Did Not, and Will Not, Yield.

When Republicans in the North Carolina state legislature lied to progressives about whether they would be voting to override the Governor's budget veto in an effort to keep them off the floor, Rep. Deb Butler stood strong for her values and earned national attention for protesting the measure from the House floor. Standing up for progressive budget priorities, like education, clean water, and affordable health care, she refused to yield while calling attention to the trickery and deceptiveness at play. See the MSNBC story here.

qbhkXlnsSdmVwiBLnQLIlj0aGrMKuk2RHS5YBM9G7w O g MKBYUsd8t6MRC6fmaoGDH9ejOen4uFDjA

4. Rep. Lamar Fought TN’s Abortion Ban as Only Female Legislator of Child-Bearing Age

In March of this year, the mostly-male Tennessee legislature (111 out of 132 members are men) was debating a six-week abortion ban. Rep. London Lamar fought against the ban, pointing out that she was one of, if not the only, female legislator of child-bearing age. “Access to abortion cannot be separated from human rights,” she said. 

Gp2FddGCYYRZx9m1QE5sAfHDo2YAS67jTM9topdXbDfFjMRVZgwgd Cp5yYPqz6lXt9FKXYNtiEupyzdQAUD42JU7ZxjrO9uve2pW0Qzjw5nD29E4Q1

5. MI Rep. Tenisha Yancey Fought to Give Michiganders a Second Chance

Rep. Tenisha Yancey of Michigan said the crimes she committed when she was 17 continue to “haunt her and follow her,” as she encouraged her colleagues to vote for a package of criminal justice reform bills. The legislation is notable not only for the impact it will have on the lives of Michiganders but also its strong bipartisan support and continues to the state Senate.

ZnLyAp8GMacnaFh8jB6f

6. Crossing State Lines, Women Came Together to Stand Up for Abortion Access

Faced with dangerous abortion restrictions in their own states, Missouri Rep. Cora Faith Walker and Georgia legislators Sen. Nikema Williams and Rep. Dar’shun Kendrick traveled to visit the Illinois legislature for a press conference to underscore the urgency of the issue of abortion bans as Illinois considered a proactive measure on abortion access, known as theReproductive Health Act. With a broader understanding of the national effort to prohibit abortion, the IL legislature ultimately passed the Reproductive Heath Act.

c9ggo21lmQZKVsoz2gP4smz m uYMPwZr680GlccZvkWWDGBhDTtexyQMXUdNTP7cqFRvPN5FtnTYFSN5Etn4lwmsRUGL916ezD2Rj7fyXEo7U4D6mSY yV3MzddbD0zhmPhcid
MO Rep. Cora Faith Walker, IL Sen. Melinda Bush, GA Sen. Nikema Williams, GA Rep. Dar'shun Kendrick

7. Sen. Stephanie Flowers Fought AR’s Stand Your Ground Bill: “You are not going to silence me!” 

During a Judiciary Committee hearing on a so-called “stand your ground” bill, Arkansas State Senator Stephanie Flowers delivered stinging criticism of the bill. When committee leadership tried to speed debate along and cut her comments short, Sen. Flowers refused to be silenced. Fortunately, the bill died in the committee.

SH1gsGpH uGJL4xlFapoowtpZF9WDTVblPYo6EXKPWA8efLDxTS9AyBj1 WfhAr dcP6g4Zu2WcpxxXPiMc4wnJ qVeww30NKF

8. If You Can’t say “Tampons,” You Shouldn’t Restrict Them

“If you don’t want to say the word ‘tampon,’ then you shouldn’t restrict access to one,” said Colorado State Representative Leslie Herod advocating on behalf of incarcerated women who have limited access to feminine hygiene products in prison. The bill, which ensures incarcerated women have access to the products they need, is now law.

KEp5kDGZS5KnNw9OGRAdJtj0cVkcboR4u7kTbNIkO aQzQj1lTHFVqOJI3FfjBsi oMYJf7wPDfqCIN03z

9. “If you’re not here fighting for the most vulnerable, why are you here?” Asks PA Sen. Katie Muth

When Republicans in the Pennsylvania Senate called for a vote to eliminate funding that supports the state’s poorest residents, Sen. Katie Muth took the podium and read the testimony of a formerly homeless man who benefited from the program that conservatives wanted to defund. While she read, Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman continuously shouted over her—so much so that he became hoarse. Sen. Muth refused to be silenced and read the testimony in full, guaranteeing that the testimony would make it onto the official record.

rxFUYb9ni0iv5IbFSDrxq5fcOY2y7 8zjvVB5J7F7 r 0 1YlX6JrcbVFlGuyg57cA8N6ik6S1fyV3S4WD9ym5qcaa3RQ 6VIEiObU0L5 ti632jGhaR0a9B6HRJJ0lJmYQBBHj

10. Rep. Howse Unleashes on Abortion Ban After El Salvador Trip

Five state legislators traveled to El Salvador with SiX staff to see the impacts of the country’s strict abortion bans. During the trip, conservatives in Ohio brought forward one of the most draconian abortion bans in the nation. Ohio Rep. Stephanie Howse returned from El Salvador recommitted to defending abortion access and unleashed on the bill in this interview with Scene Magazine. “Lawmakers are talking about ‘pro-life,’ but then give zero care about what sort of lives people are living. If they did, we'd have affordable housing. We'd have great education systems. We'd have family sustaining wages. We'd have access to healthcare,” said Rep. Howse.

graQnoLKtJyzGg1Ezm0gmYNf4 X89odtyfJFczIcFUXgnR229KEKrCCVmX8GRZQilTZ8gkyAK d KsuEP5HVWfFhLGUuGWnaWXrLfy bdvWk6RebGqTJ4AFaGVUi b2cRQTSEk6Q

There were so many more moments from 2019 that demonstrated the dedication progressive state legislators bring to their work. We are thankful to every state legislator who works tirelessly to strengthen our democracy, fight for working families advance reproductive freedom, defend civil rights and liberties and protect the environment. Follow @stateinnovation on Twitter for highlights throughout the year. 

Health care costs, support for working people top concerns in new Michigan poll

Voters support health care reforms and progressive economic initiatives

A recent poll conducted by Lincoln Park Strategies for SiX shows that economic concerns around the skyrocketing cost of health care and prescription drugs remain key issues for Michigan residents. It highlights that progressive policy solutions like addressing the abuses of drug companies, capping copays, and demanding more transparency are priorities for voters and would make a real difference for Michigan families.

Voters continue to support working people when it comes to measures that expand eligibility for overtime protections, prevent wage theft and payroll fraud, and create a student bill of rights for higher education loan borrowers. They also favor corporations paying their fair share of taxes, particularly as the state continues to grapple with finding enough revenue to invest in priorities like roads and schools.

Residents want action to improve election security

The survey also explored attitudes around the status of election security, openness to further voting reforms, and census participation. Michigan residents value more secure election systems and expect state lawmakers to address it. A majority of respondents supports taking the reforms approved by voters last year a step further by automatically mailing a ballot to all voters. A plurality are also interested in using the new online option for participating in the census next year.

For the polling on health care and economic issues, see more results here and analysis here. For the polling analysis on election security and the census, see here

Survey Methodology

Grateful for Michigan Lawmakers and a Governor who Fight for Working People

During this season of reflection and gratitude, we would like to pause to acknowledge the bold steps some lawmakers and Governor Gretchen Whitmer are taking on behalf of people in Michigan who work more than 40 hours each week but who aren’t being compensated for their extra hours. Several weeks ago, the Governor announced a plan to initiate a new rule that would qualify nearly 200,000 additional salaried workers in Michigan for overtime protections. This follows strong legislative proposals introduced in both chambers spearheaded by Senate Minority Leader Jim Ananich (Flint) and House Minority Leader Christine Grieg (Farmington Hills). The bills have 46 cosponsors.

For decades, middle-class Michiganders have been working longer and harder than ever, but the wages they take home are falling further and further behind. The current overtime eligibility situation exacerbates those dynamics. A recently announced weak federal rule would still mean that salaried workers earning anything over $35,568 a year would not be paid time-and-a-half when they work more than 40 hours in a week. Fortunately, these Michigan lawmakers and Governor Whitmer are proposing much stronger standards that would help hundreds of thousands of workers and pump more than $30 million into our economy.

It’s not just numbers on a spreadsheet that make sense when it comes to this issue. We have heard from actual workers like “Julia,” the West Michigan retail manager who asked to remain anonymous out of fear of retaliation. She regularly works over 50 hours a week and still struggles just to pay her bills because her employer is not required to provide overtime pay, regardless of the number of hours she works. Too many Michiganders can relate, which is why there is broad public support for expanded overtime protections.

Lawmakers and the Governor heard directly from business owners and workers who would benefit from increased overtime protections when they recently sat down together in a New Boston diner. Representatives Darrin Camilleri (Brownstown), Mari Manoogian (Birmingham), and Matt Koleszar (Plymouth) joined the Governor in listening to the concerns of local families and shared how the proposals they support would make a real difference in people’s lives. The Governor will continue to hear from residents and share support for strong pro-worker policies when she holds a telephone town hall on Tuesday, December 10 from 5:30-6:30 EST with Representatives Lori Sone (Warren), Nate Shannon (Sterling Heights), and Senator Paul Wojno (Warren).

As 2019 comes to a close and we head into an important legislative season at the beginning of 2020, it will be more important than ever to continue the fight for an economy that works for everyone. Officials in other states like Pennsylvania and Washington have already moved forward on expanded overtime protections and several others like Maine, Massachusetts and Colorado are also considering measures. We must remain united in pushing back against conservative opponents who would prefer stalling or who advocate for weakened versions. Hundreds of thousands of working people are counting on it.

Growing, Giving Thanks, and Getting Ready to Govern in 2020

As we approach the holidays, we at SiX want to thank our incredible network of state legislators. Serving as a state legislator is no easy task, and we are grateful for the dedication and courage they bring to the job.

Since our founding in 2014, legislators have relied on SiX to provide customized policy support, trainings, research, communications support, and connections with grassroots and national partners. We’ve grown to an organization of almost 30 passionate and talented staff members.

This year, we focused on year-round support and in-state, regional, and international trainings. In 2020, we are deepening this approach to better tailor our support to our expanding and diversifying network of legislators.

Here's just some of what we've been up to in the last year:

We also launched the Progressive Governance Academy (PGA)!

The PGA is a joint project between Local Progress, SiX, and re:power to build and develop the leadership and governance skills of progressive state and local elected officials across the country. Trainings cover a range of topics including: developing a policy agenda, tools for accomplishing their goals, and navigating complex challenges of governing as an elected official. Email john@stateinnovation.org to find out more. 

Here are some more highlights on how we're growing and changing to better support progressive state legislators:

State Director Model

Two years ago we started our new State Director model based on what we’ve heard from state legislators: they don’t need a national organization that parachutes in and offers one-time resources that don’t reflect the unique and ever-changing dynamics on the ground in their state. To make sure support is ongoing, tailored to each state, and builds over time, we currently have State Directors in AZ, CO, FL, MD, ME, MI, NC, NV, PA, VA, and WA. This model has proved to be hugely impactful in these states and we hope to be able to grow and expand into more states in the coming years. By focusing resources on-the-ground in state capitols rather than in Washington, D.C., SiX is bringing essential tools and supports where we know legislators need them most.

For states where we do not yet have an in-state presence, our issue programs and central staff continue to offer services including communications support, research, and trainings.

Issue Programs

Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council

The Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council (RFLC) is a cohort of over 400 state legislators from around the country standing up for a bold vision of abortion rights and access. Members of the RFLC gain access to skills-building events and opportunities both on-the-ground and online, and are part of a national network engaging in cross-state learning and amplification. Contact reproductiverights@stateinnovation.org for more information.

Democracy Project

The Democracy Project empowers and emboldens state legislators to be dynamic advocates for a powerful, inclusive and participatory democracy. The project unites state legislators and grassroots movements behind a bold platform of reforms and deepens legislative impact in state legislatures across America. To learn more, reach out to democracy@stateinnovation.org.

Agriculture Program

The SiX Agriculture Program supports policies that promote thriving rural communities through ecologically and socially responsible agriculture and local food systems. The program provides resources and strategy advice to state legislators who know that the production of our food doesn't have to come at the expense of our water and air-or healthy conditions for workers or neighbors. Contact kendra@stateinnovation.org.

Legislators and partners are welcome to reach out to helpdesk@stateinnovation.org at any time. We welcome partnership, collaboration and ideas as we move forward. 

North Carolinians’ Attitudes on Key Progressive Issues Strongly Positive

State Innovation Exchange (SiX) and the NC Budget and Tax Center (BTC) recently collaborated on an online focus group to test North Carolina voters’ attitudes on the state’s tax system, thoughts on public assistance programs, voting rights and other issues. This survey asked 150 white swing voters and 150 voters of color to provide their opinions and react to key arguments around a range of progressive policy solutions. The results showed that these groups equally support a fair tax system, helping working families gain financial security, ending gerrymandering, providing greater access to the ballot box, and more legislative efforts to ensure an economy that works for everyone.

Results of the survey can be found here.

Repealing Hyde Not Just an Issue for DC

By: Rep. Sheryl Cole, MPT Delia Garza, Rep. Joyce McCreight, CM Carlina Rivera

Representative Sheryl Cole represents Texas District 46. 
Mayor Pro Tem Delia Garza represents District 2 in Southeast Austin.
Representative Joyce “Jay” McCreight represents Maine District 51.
Council member Carlina Rivera represents the 2nd Council District of New York City Council.

The national conversation about reproductive rights has been dominated this year by the spate of abortion bans passed across the country as well as the Trump administration’s gag rule affecting Title X funding. But banning abortion isn’t the only avenue to making it hard to get.  Since the Hyde Amendment was passed by Congress 43 years ago, it has done exactly what it was set up to do: deny low-income people the right to an abortion, forcing them to carry unintended pregnancies to term.

The Hyde Amendment is a federal restriction that withholds insurance coverage for abortion from those enrolled in the Medicaid health insurance program, except in the limited cases of rape, incest, and life endangerment. As elected officials and members of the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council, we honor the personal decision of whether, when, and how to become a parent and condemn the Hyde Amendment for what it is: political interference with decisions about pregnancy and parenting. When a person has decided to end their pregnancy, they should be able to get safe, timely, affordable care in their community, regardless of income. 

As Trump and Pence continue to push their agenda of punishment and shame, it is up to the states and cities to protect people who are already failed by our health system--women of color, young people, transgender and non-binary people, immigrants, and people who live in rural areas.

The Hyde Amendment stands in large part not because of public support, but because of political inertia. A national poll recently released found that:

While this new polling demonstrates overwhelming support for providing insurance coverage for abortions, many state legislatures have acted against the will of the people and raced to ban abortion.  According to the Guttmacher Institute, in 2019, states enacted 58 abortion restrictions, 26 of which would ban all, most, or some abortions. With the balance of the Supreme Court now turned against abortion rights, the threat of abortion care being further dismantled or pushed out of reach entirely is real. 

Although for over four decades the Hyde Amendment has denied federal Medicaid coverage of abortion, we must remember Hyde is not permanent. Every year Congress has an opportunity to pass a budget without the Hyde Amendment.  In the meantime, there are actions that states and cities have taken that our colleagues could follow to ensure a person can access the care they need.

This year Maine became the 16th state to guarantee Medicaid coverage for abortion by passing LD 820, a bill that expands public and private insurance coverage of abortion care.  

In Maine we saw the combination of restrictions and coverage bans across the country forcing people to delay care or stop them from getting abortions altogether.  Restricting Medicaid coverage of abortion forces one in four poor women seeking an abortion to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.  When a woman wants to get an abortion but is denied, she is more likely to fall into poverty, less likely to have a full-time job, and twice as likely to experience domestic violence.

In Texas we worked to introduce Rosie's Law, which would have restored Texas Medicaid coverage for abortion care services for low-income Texans. 

This bill was named in honor of Rosie Jiménez, a beloved mother, student, and young Chicana, who was the first victim of the Hyde Amendment in 1977. When Rosie realized she was pregnant and was too poor to pay for a safe and legal procedure at a clinic, she sought out a cheaper, unsafe abortion. She suffered a painful death from an infection that ravaged her body and led to her preventable death at the age of 27.

While this bill did not pass into law, the conversations started by lawmakers and young activists alike have paved the way for the fight for Medicaid coverage to continue into the next legislative session.

Cities like Austin and New York City are already taking steps to fill the gap that Hyde has created. Austin City Council has set aside $150,000 and New York City Council $250,000 to lessen financial and logistical barriers that make it difficult and sometimes impossible for low-income individuals to access abortion.

This isn’t just an issue for Washington, DC.  As state and local leaders, we encourage our colleagues everywhere to fight back against restrictions that hit hardest at low-income people and widen inequalities even further. In the end, it will take us all -- state legislators, individual advocates, city council members, and members of Congress -- to ensure that abortion is accessible, affordable, and safe for all, no matter their economic situation.

National Voter Registration Day Honors Our Future and Our Past

By Texas State Representative Toni Rose

I have voted in some elections that I’ve been really excited about, and some that I haven’t, but every time I go into that voting booth, I think of my grandmother and the obstacles she had to endure, and the price she had to pay for a poll tax in order for her to cast a vote. Now, the amount might seem small to some, but the disrespect and the indignities she suffered to cast her votes were huge.

That is why I celebrate National Voter Registration Day on September 24th. I have a duty as an American, as a Texan, and to my grandmother is to show up and cast my ballot in every election. We as citizens are charged with the responsibility of shaping the direction of this country and this state. If we don’t do our job, who will?

I don’t claim that it’s easy. The poll tax and the intimidation tactics are not a thing of the past, they have been modernized and come in many forms across the country and even in this state. It was a true disappointment that SB 9 was voted out of committee this past legislative session--a bill which would have opened the door to voter suppression, criminalize even honest mistakes, and opened Texas up to Election Day chaos by employing a voter verification program that proved to be unreliable and riddled with cybersecurity weaknesses in other states. In that hearing, I heard how passionate and important voting is to Texans. Over 200 people showed up to give public testimony in opposition to the bill. This critical hearing ran well past midnight and it was truly inspiring!

Don’t get me wrong, we absolutely need to make sure that our voting rolls are more accurate and secure; however, registration should also be more accessible and voting more convenient. We should push to modernize how we register and how we update registrations. Our laws should ensure that every eligible voter’s voice is heard, not make it more difficult for those who serve in the military, are elderly, or move often have difficulty exercising this sacred duty.

National Voter Registration Day is a holiday that we should all celebrate by checking our voter registration to make sure it is up to date and accurate and checking with our family, neighbors, and friends.  We all know our democracy works best when all eligible voters can participate and have their voices heard.  Unfortunately, every year millions of eligible Americans find themselves unable to vote because they miss a registration deadline, don’t update their registration, or aren’t sure how to register.

In 2018, over 800,000 voters registered for the first time or updated their records on National Voter Registration Day. I believe that we could top that figure in 2019 in Texas alone! Celebrate September 24 by making sure your registration is up to date so that every Texan can fulfill their duty to this great state and country and make their voice heard!

House Member Toni Rose proudly represents District 110 in the Texas House of Representatives.

Mainers Concerned About Economy and Health Care, Support the Recent Actions Taken in the 2019 Legislative Session

A recent poll commissioned by the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) shows Mainers are concerned about pocketbook economic issues, the affordability of health care, and education. Mainers also support recent state legislative actions to address these issues and the direction Maine is going after the 2019 legislative session.

Legislators took significant steps in the 2019 session to address the concerns of Mainers and this polling demonstrates ongoing support for progressive policy solutions to the problems facing the state.

Mainers Support Action on Economic Concerns

On a scale of 1 to 10, voters supported legislative action to: 

Voters Support Action on Health Care 

Maine voters prioritize action on health care with a focus on affordability and addressing the opioid epidemic. On a scale of 1 to 10, voters supported legislative action to: 

Mainers Support Action on Education

Maine voters are concerned about the affordability of higher education and support action to increase access to early childhood education. On a scale of 1 to 10, voters supported legislative action to:

Click here to see the poll memo and here for a presentation on full results.

###

The State Innovation Exchange commissioned Lincoln Park Strategies to complete the research.  The survey was conducted June 14 to June 20 with 600 respondents and has a margin of error ± 4 percent at the 95% confidence interval.

Broad Popular Support for Economic Security Reforms Among Colorado Voters

SUPPORT FOR A PAID FAMILY LEAVE PROGRAM

A recent poll conducted by Strategies 360 for State Innovation Exchange (SiX) revealed that Colorado voters overwhelmingly support a paid family and medical leave program that is available to all Colorado workers. Across age, gender, and geography, a strong majority of Coloradans favor the creation of a paid insurance program that is funded by employees and employers. From working families who are expecting children to older adults who face potential medical emergencies, Coloradans have spoken in favor of an insurance program that works for everyone in their most difficult moments.

Click here for the full results.

SUPPORT FOR A STATE-BACKED RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

Coloradans are equally enthusiastic about a proposal to create a retirement savings plan accessible to all workers and backed by the State of Colorado. The popularity of this program transcends ideology and income, as 69% of Colorado voters support the idea. With nearly a quarter of respondents reporting that they have no retirement plan, a state-wide program has obvious appeal. Additionally, there remains intense support for the program even for those with an existing retirement plan. In the 21st century, Colorado workers understand the value of a retirement plan that moves with an individual from job to job.

Click here for the full results.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

Strategies 360 conducted an online survey among 600 registered voters in Colorado. The survey was conducted June 21 - 26, 2019. The margin of error for a survey of 600 interviews is ±4.0% at the 95% confidence level for each individual sample. Respondents were randomly selected from a statewide panel of residents and screened on their voter registration status.

Maine sees big wins in 2019

The 2019 Maine legislative session adjourned on June 20 with several wins for working people—including on health care, civil rights, incomes, paid leave, reproductive rights, and democracy reform.

Medicaid Expansion

Conservatives have denied Mainers access to Medicaid expansion for years, even over the wishes of voters. When Governor Mills took office in 2019, she promised that fully funding and implementing expansion would be her first action. Together with progressive legislators, many of whom had been fighting for Medicaid expansion for years, Governor Mills delivered on her promise and fully funded and implemented the measure. Nearly 70,000 Mainers will now gain health care access.

Equal Pay for Equal Work

Although blatant gender discrimination is technically against the law in Maine, there are still many less obvious practices that continue to perpetuate the gender and racial wage gap. Senator Cathy Breen and Representative Mark Bryant championed legislation to level the playing field for all employees when negotiating salaries. The new law prevents employers from requiring applicants to disclose their previous salaries. That way, a new salary offer is not based on salary history, but instead on experience, skills, and the job role. The measure ensures that instances of inequitable pay do not follow employees  for their entire careers, which is especially important for women, people of color, and others who are typically underpaid.

Conversion Therapy Banned

Maine’s previous governor vetoed legislation last year to ban “conversion therapy,” a discredited and harmful practice. But sponsor Rep. Ryan Fecteau, now Assistant House Majority Leader, came back this year to fight again. The bill prevents licensed health care professionals from offering services that claim to change a client’s sexual orientation or gender identity to minors. This dangerous practice causes adverse effects in children, including depression, anxiety and drug use. Conversion therapy is already banned in many states and nearly all professional licensing organizations have condemned the practice.

Paid Time Off

A long-time champion for workers, Senator Rebecca Millett continued to fight for paid sick leave after several years of the legislation falling short in divided legislatures. Although the bill did not pass in its original form, the final version will grant paid time off for any reason to 85% of Maine’s private sector workers. Before this bill, 139,000 Maine workers have had no access to paid time off at all, and another 137,000 could not take time for any reason other than illness. 

Automatic Voter Registration (AVR)

On the final day of session, Governor Mills signed Speaker Sara Gideon’s bill to bring automatic voter registration to Maine. Eligible voters who visit the Bureau of Motor Vehicles will soon be registered to vote, or have their voting addresses updated, by default, unless they opt-out. And new agencies may join the system later on to expand AVR’s impact. This is an important step for Maine’s democracy—lowering a systemic barrier to the ballot box and modernizing outdated government processes.

Prescription Drugs

Senate President Troy Jackson, Assistant Majority Leader Senator Eloise Vitelli, and Senator Heather Sanborn have each sponsored parts of a larger package of bills aimed at lowering the prohibitive cost of prescription drugs. Legislation that ultimately passed will create a prescription drug affordability board, which would oversee and set targets for prescription drug costs for public entities; initiate a wholesale importation program to allow importation from Canada; provide more information and transparency about drug pricing all along the supply chain, and reduce the influence of pharmacy benefit managers to drive up prescription costs.

Reproductive Rights

This session saw huge gains for reproductive health access in Maine. Speaker Gideon passed a bill to allow Advanced Practice Clinicians to perform abortions, meaning that many rural women can have their local providers perform the procedure instead of traveling long distances and receive the same quality and safety. Representative Jay McCreight, another of Maine’s strongest reproductive rights champions, passed a bill to require insurance, including Medicaid, to cover abortion care. Representative Maureen “Mo” Terry’s passed a bill to allow over-the-counter prescriptions in vending machines, so now women on college campuses can have access to emergency contraception outside of traditional pharmacy hours.  

Earned Income Tax Credit and Closing Corporate Tax Loopholes

Representative Ryan Tipping’s bill to raise the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit passed in the final hours of session, giving approximately 100,000 low-income households in Maine a much-needed boost. The bill more than doubles the current rate and achieves this by closing loopholes on large out-of-state corporations.

Student Debt Bill of Rights

Senator Eloise Vitelli passed a bill to help level the playing field for student loan borrowers. The bill establishes standards to prevent student loan servicing companies from misleading borrowers and creates the “Student Loan Ombudsman” to help borrowers navigate problems with servicers.

Arizona Progressives Hold Steady and Stem Conservative Overreach

Progressive legislators stood strong in the 2019 legislative session and were able to continue to articulate the bold vision outlined in the Sunrise Agenda. Progressive discipline helped produce better policy outcomes on education, the environment and democracy for Arizonans.  

In Defense of Democracy

While progressives do not control either chamber, they were able to exert their influence and temper conservatives’ overreach. They successfully killed bills that would have made voting less accessible for eligible voters in Arizona. They successfully stopped legislation that would purge voters on the permanent early voting list and legislation that would cripple the ability to have voter registration drives.  

Environmental Wins

Progressives were also able to work across the aisle and exert their influence to pass one of the most significant pieces of water legislation in Arizona’s history. The Drought Contingency Plan allows Arizona to join six other western states and Mexico in signing onto an inter-state water agreement and spells out ways Arizona will contribute to conserving more water from the Colorado River.

The Budget Fight

The conservatives refused to debate many of the priorities that Arizonans identify as critical—like affordable healthcare and housing—and instead fought for priorities that rig the rules for the wealthy and big businesses and protect their own power.

Conservatives prioritized big tax cuts to the wealthy and big corporations while attacking minimum wage. In the budget, Flagstaff—the only city in Arizona to pay higher than the state minimum wage of $11—is now forced to reimburse the state for the difference in wages of state employees who make more than the state minimum wage.

Progressives were able stand strong, creating a political environment that forced a compromise on funding for education.  Spending for K-12 will be $5.2 billion, about $500 million more than in the current year--not nearly enough to deal with our current education crisis, but still a win for Arizona students.

Looking Forward

While the 2019 legislative session saw little progress on issues to help everyday Arizonans, progressive partners and legislators will continue to work with constituents and colleagues to build on the groundwork laid in 2019 to advance the priorities in the Sunrise Agenda: a stronger democracy; strong public schools; welcoming communities; a fair economy and cleaning up the tax code; and good stewardship of the state’s air, water and public lands.

In Nevada: First Female Majority Legislature Makes Significant Progressive Gains in 2019

In 2019, Nevada made history by becoming the first female majority legislature in the history of the United States. With this historic majority, the Nevada Legislature made momentous headway into improving our democracy and economy for working people. Through recently passed legislation, thousands of Nevadans will now have improved access to the ballot box and greater protections in the workplace.

4 Ways Nevada Progressives Made Our Democracy Stronger

Native American Voting Access

Assemblyman Watts championed AB 137, which removes the requirement for tribal governments to gain approval from election officials every election cycle to establish polling sites. Unless tribal leaders request a change, election clerks are required to continue to recognize the established polling places. This was Assemblyman Watt’s first piece of legislation that was signed into law.

IMG 3161
Photo courtesy of Kit Milller.

Voting Restoration

Speaker Frierson led the charge to pass AB 431, a bill to restore the right to vote for convicted persons upon release from prison or discharge from parole or probation. Previously, a formerly incarcerated person had to petition to have their rights restored, as well as confusion about the law and process prevented many eligible Nevadans from voting. An estimated 77,000 citizen will regain their right to vote.

AB431SigningPic
The signing of AB431

Voting Omnibus Bill

The most comprehensive voting rights bill, AB 345, aims to ensure any eligible voter seeking to access the polling booth is able to cast a ballot. There are four key provisions in this legislation including voting anywhere, online registration, same day registration and improved accommodations. Clerks gain the ability to designate polling places where anyone registered in the county may vote, regardless of the assigned polling place. Voters will now be able to register to vote on Election Day and cast their ballot, as well as register online the same day. Individuals with disabilities, deployed oversees and the elderly can now request absentee ballots for all elections instead of having to request every election.

Census

The Nevada Legislature is laying the groundwork for a fair and accurate Census count and did so through three different pieces of legislation. AJR 6, championed by the late Assemblyman Tyrone Thompson, is a resolution urging Congress to not include the citizenship question. $5 million of funding for Census outreach to underserved communities was appropriated through SB 504. Finally, AB 450 was signed into law, which is legislation that counts prison inmates in their home districts instead of prison districts for redistricting purposes.

4 Ways Nevada Progressives Made Our Economy Stronger

The Nevada Legislature took important steps toward bringing economic security to Nevada workers through several pieces of legislation, including equal pay for equal work, raising the minimum wage, earned sick days, and protecting the right to join together in union.

Equal Pay

After four years and three sessions, Senator Pat Spearman passed her Equal Pay for Equal Work legislation. Women finally have state protections if they are paid less than their male counterparts to seek justice.

Minimum Wage

After ten years without an increase in the state minimum wage, Assembly leadership sponsored legislation to begin a stepped increase to raise the minimum wage to $12 incrementally over the next five years. Additionally, the process to remove the health care provision tied to minimum wage in the Constitution was initiated.

Earned Sick Days

Previously, workers in Nevada did not legally have access to earned sick days, even if they worked full time. The new law allows for the accrual of 5 days off of earned sick time annually at employers with 50 employees or more.

EarnedSick2
Earned sick day advocates at the Nevada State Capitol

State Employee Collective Bargaining 

The bill protects the rights of state employees to join together in union to negotiate wages, vacation, sick leave, safety issues, hours and days of work, and more. Senator David Parks carried the bill for ten years before its passage this year.

Pic 2 photo cred AFSCME Local 4041
Photo from AFSCME Local 4041 at a collective bargaining rally

Television Media Training in Colorado

Media Training Application for Interested Legislators

Join the State Innovation Exchange for a media training on Friday, June 28th from 9:00-1:00 at Colorado Education Association. This half day training will provide advice around media interviews and on-camera practice for participants so that they may be more knowledgeable about messaging on policy priorities important for working Coloradans. This is an open invitation to state legislators to participate – all state legislators are welcome to apply. SiX encourages applicants to apply based on their belief and support for policies that ensure economic security for working families, an open and accessible democracy, affordable and accessible health care, and safe schools and communities. Given that there are limited spaces in this training, we will prioritize applicants with a demonstrated commitment to these issues and highly encourage diverse candidates to apply.

Sign up here.

Widespread Support for Progressive Agenda Among Michigan Voters

Key Findings from Michigan Statewide Polls for the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) reflect voter support for democratic reforms and progressive solutions to economic issues

A recent poll conducted by TargetSmart for SiX revealed that Michigan voters are hungry for concrete improvements in the everyday life of the average person and their family. From safe, modern roads to affordable auto insurance, prescription drugs, and doctor’s visits, Michiganders prioritize tangible impacts that help working people. Moreover, Michigan voters see a clear role for government in delivering these improvements and more broadly providing opportunities that help working families.

Voters are tired of seeing big banks book record profits while the streets they drive on every day are ridden with potholes. Their frustrations are easy to observe when they can’t afford their prescription drugs or their newly hiked up auto insurance bill but see pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies doing better than ever. Public opinion calls for an agenda that ensures everyone pays their fair share, corporations are held accountable, and state government provides opportunities that proactively make life better for working Michiganders.

Support for Democracy Reforms

A second survey found strong support for early voting and vote by mail options. Across all regions and demographics, citizens wanted to reduce the influence of money on policymaking and increase transparency. 

For the polling on economic issues, see more analysis here and results here. For the polling on democratic reforms, see here and here.

Survey Methodology

TargetSmart designed and administered this multi-modal survey. Five-hundred interviews were conducted via professional telephone agents (330 wireless respondents, 170 landline respondents) from May 14-23, and 509 interviews were conducted online among panelists who were matched to the TargetSmart voter file from six opt-in panel providers from May 5-23. All respondents indicated they were 18 years or older and registered to vote in Michigan. Quotas were designed to reflect the demographic and geographic distribution of registered voters in Michigan. The data were weighted by gender, age, race, TargetSmart Partisan Score, TargetSmart High School Only Score, and region by county and county council district to ensure an accurate reflection of the population.

How to Support a Fair and Accurate Census

Why Does the 2020 Census Matter?

Census data determine the allocation of more than $800 billion in annual federal funding and are often used in state and local policy making, decision making, and research. An inaccurate census in 2020 would jeopardize state funds for over 300 federal programs and compromise crucial supports for marginalized communities. Census data are also used for the reapportionment and redistricting processes and therefore vital to advancing a fair and representative democracy. Ensuring that all residents in your state are counted will require funding, coordination, and commitment from policymakers but will provide your constituents the resources and representation they deserve.

It’s critical for states to prepare now. Under SiX’s new Democracy Project, we’re working with legislators nationwide to support the census and to raise awareness of the count in local communities.

You can support the Census through legislation:
If you're a legislator and want to support the Census in your state, review this 2020 Census Legislator Brief (email info@stateinnovation.org if you need the password). Created by SiX, Common Cause, and The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, the brief offers concrete policy and outreach guidance for legislators working to ensure the 2020 Census is fair and accurate. You can also email democracy@stateinnovation.org to learn about additional, innovative census bills and initiatives.

190325 SiX census progressive
Use this graphic to show your support for the 2020 Census
on social media. Tag @stateinnovation!

You can also use your platform as an elected official to highlight the importance of the 2020 Census and drive participation in your community:

Reach out to democracy@stateinnovation.org for support on these or any other ideas.

Join the SiX Democracy Project!

SiX is launching the Democracy Project, a new program to ensure progressive state legislators across the country have the resources and support they need in order to champion democracy issues in their states. Email democracy@stateinnovation.org to join. 

The Big Winners From Colorado’s 2019 Session

By: Kyle Huelsman, SiX Colorado State Director

Working Women Will Benefit from the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act

Senator Jessie Danielson and Representative Janet Buckner have been pushing the legislature to address the gender pay gap since 2016 and finally this year they found a path with SB-85, the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act. Women in general, and women of color in particular, will soon have the opportunity to file formal complaints of wage discrimination through the state, bringing us one step closer to creating an economy that guarantees equal pay for equal work and a system that holds discriminatory employers accountable.

equal pay rally

And just for a bit of fun: here is Republican Senator Vicki Marble thanking white men for their contributions to the state legislature before voting against the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act.

Voters Will See Increased Ballot Access through Automatic Voter Registration

Senator Steve Fenberg has been quietly improving Colorado’s election system over the past three years, but the 2019 session marked a transformative moment for our state’s democracy. Automatic Voter Registration passed through the Senate in the last week of session, ushering in one of the nation’s most expansive registration programs. Of course, the ceaseless Fenberg did not stop there. He helped guide HB-1278 through the legislature as well, which will place polling locations on college campuses and allow 17-year-olds to vote in the primary if they would turn 18 by the general. But don’t take in from us, as Colorado Public Radio’s Sam Brasch wrote in his April 24th headline, "Youth Voter Turnout is Already Ridiculously High in Colorado. State House Democrats Want it Even Higher."

fenberg pic

Working Families Will See Wage Increases through Local Wage Option Legislation

Representative Rochelle Galindo of Greeley and Sen. Dominick Moreno came out swinging this year with HB-1210, which made Colorado one of the first states in the country to repeal a state ban on cities setting their own minimum wage. These top leaders within Colorado’s Latino Caucus understand the impact of wage stagnation in the face of the ever-increasing cost of living, especially in Latino communities. This bill will provide local governments with a powerful tool to provide dignity and fairness to hard-working Colorado Families.

local pic

WHAT IS LEFT FOR 2020?

Paid Family and Medical Leave

After two years of Colorado’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program sailing through the House only to be killed in the Republican-controlled Senate, Sen. Faith Winter believed that 2019 was the year for paid leave in Colorado. Yet pressure from the 215 paid business lobbyists fighting against the bill, debate over the financial solvency of the program, and a slate of potential Republican amendments, Sen. Faith Winter chose to turn the bill into an implementation plan that would study the financial solvency of the program and provide results just before the start of the 2020 session. Expect the sponsors to come back stronger than ever next January.

family pic

State Retirement Savings

Some might say that a legislative study is not a hot news tip, but Sen. Kerry Donovan has been angling since 2016 to have Colorado officials study state savings plan models. SB-173 creates the Colorado Secure Savings Plan Board which will present an official recommendation on how to create a portable, state-sponsored retirement savings plan before the 2020 legislative session.

kerry pic

Progressives Fight for Sunrise Agenda in Stormy Legislative Session

By James Chan, Florida State Director

Progressive legislators and partners kicked off the 2019 legislative session with a bold Sunrise Agenda focused on the economy, affordable health care, education, the environment and a welcoming Florida.  

But during the legislative session, conservatives, who control both chambers, refused to debate the priorities that Floridians identify as critical—like affordable healthcare and housing—and instead fought for priorities that rig the rules for the wealthy and big businesses and protect their own power. The legislative session showed how out of step conservatives are with the will of the people. The contrast between conservatives and progressives couldn’t be more clear.

Our Economy

Instead of focusing on helping Floridians make ends meet, conservatives passed legislation to ban Florida cities from requiring big developers to build any affordable housing as part of new construction. This just further lines the pockets of big businesses and the wealthy, while exacerbating the challenge in creating affordable housing in our cities and surrounding areas.  

Progressive Representatives Jacquet and Joseph with Senators Rodriguez, Cruz and Stewart advanced legislation that would help improve the lives of all Floridians. The legislation which would address equal pay, paid family leave and an increase to the minimum wage was introduced but never heard in committee, debated or voted upon.

Our Health Care

Floridians are deeply concerned about the cost and accessibility of health care and prescription drugs. Instead of addressing these issues, conservatives sought to limit women’s access to health care and the right to choose by sponsoring a six-week abortion ban, a 20-week abortion ban and a parental consent law, which was voted out of the House.  

Progressive Representative Cindy Polo and Senator Taddeo proposed expanding Medicaid to Floridians under 65 who are at or below 138% of the federal poverty line. This would provide health coverage to an estimated 850,000 hard-working Floridians currently lacking coverage—like single-moms working hard to support their families and adults working multiple jobs but still not making enough money to make ends meet. Conservatives shut down the proposal, refusing to even hear it in committee.

Our Students

Strengthening the public education system that supports 90% of Florida students is a priority for all progressive legislators. Instead of taking steps to improve public education, address the root cause of gun violence in schools and ensure Florida is able to stay competitive and keep great teachers, conservatives prioritized arming teachers and funding vouchers and charter schools in an effort to privatize our public education.  

Progressive Representative Margaret Good filed a bill that would address the critical teacher shortage. Her legislation, which had bipartisan support in the Senate, would have allowed retired educators to immediately fill substitute teacher positions helping to fill some of the 2,000 teacher vacancies across the 67 counties. The conservatives shut down this legislation and it was never heard in committee.

Our Environment

The red tide and the other impacts of climate change have taken a toll on our health, our communities and our economy. The short- and long-term economic and health impacts have Floridians along the Gulf Coast struggling. The conservative-controlled legislature took no significant action to help address these challenges.

Progressive Representatives Diamond, Eskamani and Good with Senator Rodriguez filed legislation to help us understand and address these critical issues that will shape our economy and health into the future. Progressives advanced legislation to create a climate change research program, develop a renewable energy plan and address water quality and a decrease in the use of herbicides that created the red tide. All these bills were introduced, but never heard in committee.

Our People

After the 2018 election, Florida again received national attention for our difficulty in making sure that every eligible voter’s ballot was counted. Instead of taking steps to modernize and secure the process for all eligible voters, conservatives made unnecessary changes to the rules for vote-by-mail—which is used by many Florida voters to avoid long lines at the polls. They also took steps to obstruct the will of the people by placing exorbitant fees and other requirements on those formerly incarcerated before they are allowed to vote. This after the progressive community worked to bring the Constitutional amendment restoring these rights to a vote—which was supported by 65% of the people in November 2018.

Finally, conservatives changed the process by which signatures are gathered by everyday Floridians to amend the state constitution. Over the last decade this process has been used by  the voters to address some of Florida’s most pressing issues—from pocketbook issues to who has the right to vote—because conservative lawmakers refuse to enact the policies that reflect the will of the majority of Floridians.

While the 2019 legislative session saw little progress on issues to help everyday Floridians, progressive partners and legislators will continue to work with constituents and colleagues to build on the groundwork laid in 2019 to advance the priorities in the Sunrise Agenda.

At Five Years Old, Who is SiX Today?

We, the State Innovation Exchange (SiX), are a policy resource and strategy center that provides progressive state legislators the tools, resources, and supports they need to fight back against wealthy and well-connected special interests, while making positive changes in the lives of the people they represent.

At five years old, SiX has transformed since our founding in 2014. While we started as a merger of the Center for State Innovation, the Progressive States Network, and the American Legislative and Issue Campaign Exchange (ALICE), today we are better than our parts, and our work looks very different. We are now headed by the Hon. Jessie Ulibarri, former Colorado State Senator and progressive community leader. Our guiding mission remains the same: to help progressives build lasting power at the state level.

To the question we get asked more than any other—are we the liberal version of ALEC?

No, we are not the liberal version of ALEC—we’re better. ALEC is a pay-to-play model, designed by wealthy special interests to rig the state legislative process for their gain and benefit – while destroying our democracy in the process. So no, we’re not ALEC and we don’t aspire to be. Instead, we exist to advance a bold people-centered policy vision in every state in this nation.

We don’t operate like ALEC. We don’t take corporate money and don’t require legislators to pay dues to work with us. We’re also not a “bill mill” that churns out copycat legislation for corporate interests. Instead, we share cutting-edge policy research from issue experts and provide customized technical assistance, in service of building progressive people power. 

Since our inception, we’ve heard countless times that legislators don’t need national organizations to parachute in and offer copycat legislation – just to pick up and leave the next day. As under-resourced public servants, state legislators need enduring support every day of the year. As such, SiX works in close coordination with legislators, advocacy groups, think tanks, and activists to drive responsive and powerful public policy. We provide policy tools, communication products, research, trainings, convenings, technical assistance, strategic consulting and advice, with a particular focus on the dynamics in each state, empowering legislators and building enduring progressive movement power over time. Our growing in-state and issue-based staff shows how committed we are to providing lasting and personalized support for state legislators.

We’re focused on supporting the most progressive, diverse, and exciting group of state legislators our country has seen. We’re helping them to make true the promises made to their constituents.

If you have additional questions about SiX, contact katy@stateinnovation.org

Progressive Victories in the Maryland Legislature

During this year’s legislative session, progressive Maryland state lawmakers secured victories on policies to put more money in the pockets of working people, lower the cost of health care, care for our environment, improve access to early and higher education, strengthen our democracy and more.

Highlights of legislation passed by the General Assembly include:

A $15 Minimum Wage!

Sponsored by Sen. McCray and Del. Fennell, this became law March 28 when the legislature overrode the governor’s veto. The law will raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025 (and 2026 for businesses with fewer than 15 employees).

A first-in-the-nation Prescription Drug Affordability Board!

Authored by Sen. Klausmeier and Del. Peña-Melnyk, this bill will create a Prescription Drug Affordability Board that will have the authority to establish maximum costs to be paid by state and local governments for certain high-cost medications.

A Styrofoam Ban!

Sen. Kagan and Del. Lierman sponsored this Styrofoam Ban, making Maryland the first state in the nation to do so. Passed with bipartisan support, this legislation will help Maryland reach its goal of diverting 85% of waste by reduction, reuse, and recycling by 2040.

The Clean Energy Jobs Act!

In a major environmental achievement, Sen. Feldman and Del. Lisanti passed the Clean Energy Jobs Act. This legislation requires utilities to buy a certain percentage of electricity each year from renewable sources, taking it from the current target of 25% by 2020 to 50% by 2030.

The Maryland Health Insurance Option!

Another first-in-the-nation bill passed by Maryland! Sen. Feldman and Del. Peña-Melnyk sponsored this bill establishing the Maryland Health Insurance Option designed to facilitate insurance coverage through a check box on Maryland Tax Returns. The bill is expected to lead to tens of thousands of Marylanders signing up for health insurance, which will expand the pool of people who are insured and bring down premium costs for other enrollees.

The Maryland Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit

Sen. King and Del. Kelly passed this important bill to increase funding for the Maryland Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, which will benefit approximately 110,000 Marylanders who are currently struggling to pay for adequate child care.

Election Day Voter Registration!

Maryland voters approved Election Day registration last year and it will now be implemented under this bill authored by Sen. Pinsky and Del. Reznik. It is expected to increase Maryland voter turnout between 3% and 7%.

Equal Pay!

Del. Pam Queen passed the Equal Pay Remedies and Enforcement Act which requires an employer to pay a civil penalty for violating the Equal Pay for Equal Work Law.

Oversight of For-Profit Colleges

This first-in-the-nation bill protects students by combating the emerging trend of for-profit colleges becoming non-profit entities to evade regulations. This was sponsored by Sen. Pinsky and Del. Hettleman.

The 2019 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action

The 2019 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action highlighted the work of progressive state legislators across the country who are fighting to put more money in the pockets of working people. More than 300 legislators from 43 states and 115 national and in state partners participated in the week of action!

Highlights include:

The Florida Sunrise Agenda

This past Tuesday was the first day of Florida’s 2019 legislative session. Progressive grassroots organizations and legislators unveiled their vision for Florida, the Florida Sunrise Agenda, at The People’s Response immediately following the governor’s State of the State.

FL Sunrise agenda launch
Progressive lawmakers and advocates launching the Florida Sunrise Agenda on the first day of the 2019 legislative session.

The Sunrise Agenda is based on five pillars: our healthcare, our economy, our students, our environment, and our people.

Our Healthcare: Floridians across the state want the legislature to lower healthcare costs and premiums, as well as making prescription drugs more affordable. In addition to making sure everyday Floridians are able to have access to affordable, quality healthcare coverage, 71% of voters want to ensure abortion remains legal in the state.

Our Economy: Current economic policies supported by the majority in the legislature are not working for all Floridians. The top economic policy on the minds of Florida voters is ensuring that women earn the same pay as men for the same work. Making sure equal pay for equal work policies are in place is vital not only to women, but for all families. In addition to equal pay, voters support progressive economic policies such as raising the minimum wage, earned sick leave, and paid family and medical leave.

Our Students: Floridians want the legislature to increase investment, equity, and equality in our public education system so that all students, regardless of the economic situation they are born into, have opportunities to succeed in Florida. Investing in our students also means funding a world class public education system.

Our Environment: Our state is beautiful because of our water, beaches, and nature. However, that is all at stake if the state doesn’t act when it comes to climate change. The health and well-being of our children and families are at stake. Hotter temperatures, air pollution, and warmer waters are a serious threat to the health of our residents, especially children and the elderly.

Our People: Lastly, the people of the great state of Florida are our most valuable asset. 71% of Florida voters support nondiscrimination protections for the LGBTQ community that would ensure that people are not discriminated when it comes to housing, employment, and public accommodations. Furthermore, 85% of voters agree that it is important to have an open and functioning democracy in Florida, which means we must have free and fair elections. We must modernize and better fund our election system and expand Florida’s online voter registration system is accessible to every eligible voter. Lastly, nearly 60% of Florida voters agree that we should make voter registration automatic for all citizens ages 18 and older who have drivers’ licenses.

Florida progressives are proud to present a clear vision that supports all Floridians. We will always be fighting for our healthcare, our economy, our students, our environment, and our people. To learn more about the Florida Sunrise Agenda, please visit www.flsunriseagenda.com and follow the statewide conversation on social media, using #FLSunriseAgenda.

What do North Carolina Voters Want?

Recently polling commissioned by SiX shows that voters want the legislature and the governor to focus on policies that would create an economy that works for everyone, make the investment needed for a first-class education system, and make affordable health care available to more North Carolina residents. Voters believe strongly that polluters, not ratepayers, should pay the costs of pollution. Respondents believe that voting should be as accessible as possible and oppose efforts to make access to the voting booth more difficult. Respondents also felt strongly that public dollars should be used for traditional public schools first, and oppose using taxpayer money to fund private and charter schools when public schools have inadequate funding available.

See key findings from an online survey among 600 likely voters statewide conducted February 11 to 18, 2019:

Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.50.51 PM
Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.42.02 PM
Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.42.12 PM
Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.42.22 PM
Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.42.31 PM 1
Screen Shot 2019 03 07 at 2.42.40 PM 1

Polling Shows Overwhelming Support for Laws That Help Families Thrive

Recent polls coordinated by SiX in states across the country show that state policies that will help families thrive are overwhelmingly popular. SiX tested support for policies that would ensure equal pay, overtime pay, paid sick leave, paid family leave and childcare funding in North Carolina, Maine, Washington, Arizona, Virginia, Maryland and Colorado. Those opposed? Wealthy special interests.

Equal Pay

Equal pay is supported by 84% of North Carolina voters, 79% in Maine and 92% in Washington. In all of these states, voters understand that wages have not kept up with the cost of living and, for women and people of color, the wage gap exacerbates that challenge.

Overtime Pay

After concerns from people in their states, several legislators are advocating laws to strengthen overtime pay for workers who work more than eight hours a day or 40 per week. Voters in North Carolina (84%), Maine (79%), Washington (92%) and Arizona (90%) strongly support these stronger laws.

Earned Paid Sick Leave

Voters in North Carolina (73%) and Maine (70%) believe workers should have access to paid sick leave.

Paid Family Leave

The federal Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was passed 26 years ago, ensuring many American workers don’t lose their job when caring for family members, including the birth or adoption of a child. Voters believe they shouldn’t lose their paychecks while they take care of themselves or their loved ones. Respondents in Maryland (83%), Virginia (84%) and Arizona (83%) support paid family leave.

Child Care Funding

More and more data shows a crisis for families trying to make ends meet and accessing child care amid rising costs. Voters understand that a strong workforce must include helping workers with child care costs. Some families must leave their jobs in order to care for their children because the cost of childcare exceeds the income of one parent. In single-parent households, this is not an option. When businesses lose workers to child care, they lose institutional memory and expertise and must deal with unnecessary turnover. Voters in North Carolina (72%), Maine (68%), and Washington (77%) support increased funding for childcare to support both families and businesses.

Healthcare

The opioid epidemic gripping our nation is of great concern for voters.  Policies that address the crisis through education and funding are strongly supported by voters in Colorado (74%), North Carolina (8.0/10), and Virginia (8.0/10).  

Voters also want state legislatures to address the rising cost of  healthcare. Across the country voters support policies like Medicaid buy-in Arizona (69%), Colorado (78%), Maine (6.89/10), Virginia (7.5/10) and North Carolina (7.4/10).

Funding Public Education

Voters view access to a world-class public education as necessary for opening doors and leveling the playing field for future generations. Voters in Maryland (72%) and North Carolina (7.7/10) support the expansion of  Pre-K programs and voters in Arizona (85%) and Maine (8.13/10) support strengthening funding for public education.


The Labor Movement is #FightingforFamilies in Every State

By: AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Liz Shuler

In her response to President Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night, Stacey Abrams encapsulated the sentiment of our current times when she said, “Under the current administration, hard-working Americans are falling behind, living paycheck to paycheck, most without labor unions to protect them from even worse harm.”

The easiest and most effective way to reverse this trend is to support and expand collective bargaining. A bigger, stronger labor movement is the surefire path to higher wages, better benefits, safety at work and a voice on the job. Not to mention, the issues far too many working Americans are still fighting for—equal pay, paid family leave and protection from discrimination, to name a few—are more likely with a union card.

Nearly seven million women have a voice on the job thanks to our union membership, and collective bargaining has helped to narrow the pay gap between men and women. A typical woman in a union job makes $231 more a week and is far more likely to have health benefits and retirement security.

But we are not satisfied. Not when 87% of American workers don’t have paid family leave. Not when parents have to choose between a paycheck and welcoming a newborn into the world or caring for an elderly parent. Not when queer and trans people can still be fired for who they are in more than half of all states. And not when sexual harassment continues to corrode our workplaces and communities.

The labor movement is committed to winning justice, both through our contracts and progressive public policy, in every state across the country.

Even before #MeToo became a worldwide rallying cry, the labor movement began looking at ways to change ourselves from within. The AFL-CIO took a long hard look at our own behavior and adopted a strict anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policy. We also enacted a comprehensive Code of Conduct, which is the first order of business at every single meeting and is supported by an ongoing education program to change the culture of our unions and workplaces. From movie studios and newsrooms to restaurants and hotels, organized labor has drawn a clear line in the sand.

We’ve also bargained countless union contracts, in red and blue states, over the years to support and protect LGBTQ workers, ensuring that all members have equal access to key benefits and are free from discrimination and violence on the job. For many LGBTQ Americans, a union card is their only form of protection at work.

Advancing fairness and justice benefits all working people, regardless of where we work or live. That’s why we’re #FightingforFamilies and supporting the paid family and medical leave legislation recently introduced in 20 states, from Virginia to Minnesota. Workers also advocated for policies that recently raised the minimum wage in five states, including three which are now on a path to $15 per hour.

We’re leading the charge to raise the federal minimum wage, which hasn’t been increased in almost a decade. And, we’re supporting policies that protect LGBTQ workers and pregnant women on the job.

Yet today, this simple fact remains: Forming a union is the most direct and effective way to secure equal pay, paid family leave, more flexible schedules, protection from discrimination and a seat at the table. Forming a union is the best way to fight for families.

Join us. Together, we can change the status quo for families in every state, across our country and the world.

State Legislators Commit to MeToo Policy Advances in #20Statesby2020

By Andrea Johnson, Senior Counsel for State Policy, National Women’s Law Center

When #MeToo went viral in October 2017, there was a scramble by state and federal lawmakers to meet the bravery of the survivors coming forward and enact meaningful, substantive policy reforms to stop and prevent sexual harassment. Our phones at the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) rang off the hook with calls from state and federal legislators urgently trying to figure out what they could do to address sexual harassment in their communities. We spent much of 2018 flying and video streaming into states from California to Rhode Island, and Colorado to Texas, to testify in front of newly formed sexual harassment committees and task forces. In a few short months, well over 100 bills were introduced in state legislatures to toughen protections against harassment in workplaces and schools. And at least 11 states enacted legislation to strengthen transparency, accountability, and prevention measures in workplaces.

Underlying this scramble was no doubt a concern that MeToo was just a moment, not a movement. That the political will to enact long overdue reforms to our sexual harassment laws would soon die out.

But as state legislative sessions began again this year, over 300 state legislators representing 40 states and the District of Columbia came forward and loudly declared that they are committed to supporting survivors and working to address sexual harassment.

These legislators—hailing from all corners of the country and both sides of the aisle—signed a letter of commitment to strengthen protections against sexual harassment and violence at work, in schools, homes, and communities by 2020. In signing this “#20Statesby2020 initiative, they pledged to work with survivors and the communities most seriously affected by sexual violence—including women of color, immigrants, and LBGTQIA individuals—to create concrete solutions to end sexual abuse.

State legislators have been at the forefront of the policy response to MeToo and they know real change requires a sustained commitment from lawmakers to addressing the long list of needed policy reforms. They also know that last fall, voters demanded leaders who champion safety and dignity for all survivors. And now with historically high numbers of women serving in state legislatures, many with their own MeToo stories, state legislators know they must continue to push for MeToo policy reforms; they cannot wait for Congress to act.

In the first few weeks of 2019, we have already seen state legislators working to strengthen protections against sexual harassment, and in some states, all forms of harassment and discrimination in the workplace:

At a time when partisan politics seems to have reached a fever pitch, conservative and progressive legislators alike, in states from South Carolina to Oregon, have been speaking out and pushing for long overdue reforms to our anti-harassment laws, many of them motivated and united by their own MeToo stories. They also recognize that fighting for MeToo policy reforms is about #FightingForFamilies. If we are fighting for good jobs and economic security for families, we must be fighting to stop sexual harassment because it directly threatens the ability of those targeted to get and keep a good job, to succeed at work, and to care and provide for their families.

We commend those who are #FightingForFamilies in our state capitols and seeking to build a better world in the #MeToo era. We look forward to seeing the progress that 2019 brings as we strive towards #20Statesby2020.

To Achieve Economic Freedom, Young People Need Access to Reproductive Care, Including Abortion

By: Victoria Torres, 1 in 3 Campaign Activist with Advocates for Youth

Victoria Torres, 21, is 1 in 3 Campaign activist with Advocates for Youth, a national organization dedicated to uplifting policies and programs that allow young people to make the best decisions about their own reproductive and sexual health. 

As a peer wellness educator and activist for over six years, I’ve seen first-hand how financial barriers to reproductive health put families, especially low-income families, at risk.

The high school I attended offered sexual health education and contraceptives, but like many programs encouraged abstinence. The reality is that teens are having sex and young people need comprehensive sexual health programs that teach us the full range of reproductive health.

I am a first-generation Latina who comes from a low-income background. My mother is from Mexico—she came to America looking for a better life and to get away from the generational poverty she lived in. My dad is from Puerto Rico. And even though my parents are no longer together, they have always wanted more for me. Money has always been an issue, but my mother was doing all she could to make ends meet.

In my culture, talking about sex and birth control is forbidden. There’s an unspoken rule about sex – don’t have it. I had to find resources and answers to my questions on my own. And at 19 years old and a sophomore in college I became pregnant. I was sexually active and the recommended birth control for my body size cost more than $120 per month. I could not afford it and took the generic $20 option. I was also an uninsured college student because my university insurance cost more than $1,200 a year. As a struggling college student there was no way I could afford it.

When I found out I was around three months pregnant I automatically knew I did not want to be a parent. I was still in school and wanted to get my degree. I knew that abortion was something I wanted. When I sought out resources I came across Aid for Women, a crisis pregnancy center that gave me misleading medical information and basically tried to talk me out of my abortion. It was incredibly belittling and hurtful. All I wanted was an abortion and someone who knew nothing about my background tried to make me feel like I was in a crisis, which I knew I wasn’t. In that moment I needed access to healthcare, not their judgement.

I reached out to Planned Parenthood and was able to get the care I needed. There they offered a sliding scale payment process so I didn’t have to pay as much.


Now at 21 years old, I’ve had two abortions and do not regret either of them. For my second abortion, I remember a nurse came out and said, “line up if you’re here for the abortion.” She corrected herself and called out a list of numbers that were associated with a pregnant individual. I stood in line with 11 other women, all of whom identified as women of color. I felt empowered and unafraid because most of us were talking about how this wasn’t our first abortion. There’s an extra level of stigma associated with having more than one abortion but being open about the financial barriers and stigma helped me understand I was not alone.

My ability to make my own reproductive health decision on abortion was focused on costs. I knew I wanted the procedure. The question was not if I should or should not have an abortion, instead it was whether I could afford it. For many, the unforeseen costs associated with having an abortion, such as transportation, foregone wages, and childcare if needed, put many people in the tough decision of deciding whether or not to carry a pregnancy that they know they don’t want. I know that if I was unable to overcome the financial barriers of getting an abortion, I would have been stuck in the generational poverty that my mother was trying to get away from.

Reproductive and sexual freedom is at its core an economic issue, and we need to provide young people with the information and resources they need to make the best decisions about their own reproductive and sexual health.

Momentum Building toward Pay Equity: States are a Key Part of a Multi-Pronged Effort

By Kim Churches, the chief executive officer of the American Association of University Women.

We’ve been hearing the same grim story about the gender pay gap for far too long: Working women take home, on average, 20 percent less than working men—and the gap is even wider for women of color. While the median annual salary for American men working full time is $52,146, for women, it’s just $41,977.

In 2019, the fact that such an inequity still exists is nothing short of outrageous.

But I am an optimist, so I prefer to focus on the progress that’s being made to close the pay gap—and the good news is that we’re seeing a lot. Over the past few years, federal, state and local policymakers—as well as employers around the country—have taken concrete steps to help narrow the gap. And a roadmap is beginning to emerge that shows we can conquer this problem once and for all.

Some of the most exemplary work is happening in state capitols, where legislators are listening to women and their families and declaring that enough is enough. In 2015, 2016 and 2017, dozens of state legislatures proposed and enacted legislation addressing pay inequality, and in 2018 a whopping 40 states and Washington, D.C., offered legislative solutions to the gender pay gap, with six states successfully enacting new laws. These legislative solutions range from banning the use of salary history in the hiring process and ensuring that workers can discuss their salaries without the fear of retaliation, to establishing strong remedies so that employees who have been wronged can recover lost wages and employers who have violated the law are deterred from doing so again.

Such a high level of activity indicates that state officials understand that the pay gap is real and that they need to take action to close it. Already, in the early days of the 2019 state legislative sessions, over 30 states have introduced bills to combat the gender pay gap. These bills are sponsored by a diverse set of members on both sides of the aisle. If history repeats itself—and here at the American Association of University Women (AAUW) we are working hard to make this a reality—at least a handful of states will successfully pass legislation this year.

There are promising signs on other fronts, as well. Earlier this month, federal lawmakers introduced the Paycheck Fairness Act, a much-needed initiative to close loopholes in the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and add new provisions to stop pay discrimination. Every Democrat in both the House and Senate is an original co-sponsor of the bill, and it has Republican support in the House.

We’re also seeing momentum building in the private sector. More and more employers are abandoning policies requiring pay secrecy and proactively undertaking salary audits and other initiatives shown to help narrow the gap. They’re discovering that what’s good for American families is good for their business.

At AAUW, we’re working to support all these efforts. Our research reports—including The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap and Graduating to a Pay Gap—give policymakers and advocates the crucial information they need to understand and explain this pervasive problem. Our government relations staff is assisting elected officials by creating and helping to pass strong policies. And our members around the country are working within their communities to advance change.

AAUW is also working directly with individual women to help narrow their own pay gap: Our Work Smart salary negotiation workshops have equipped thousands of women across the country with tools and resources to help them negotiate for the salary and benefits they deserve. Last fall, we introduced Work Smart Online to expand the reach of the program. With partnerships already underway in a number of states and local areas, we’re ambitiously aiming to train millions more women nationwide by 2020.

The pay gap is a long-standing and complex problem, but there’s widespread agreement that the time has come to solve it. Not only is equal pay a matter of basic fairness, it is also good for everyone: According to the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, closing the pay gap would cut the poverty rate for working women in half and lift 2.5 million children out of poverty. It would strengthen families and communities, lead to economic growth, and foster global competitiveness.

We know what we need to do. Thanks to exemplary leadership on a state level, we have a good idea of how we can do it. Now let’s commit together to getting it done.

While Federal Gridlock Dominates the News, State Legislators are Fighting for Families

By Jessie Ulibarri, Executive Director of the State Innovation Exchange

While many pundits and politicos have been focused on Washington this week, we at the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) are focused on the progressive legislators who are fast at work in state capitols advancing legislation to improve the lives of working families. That is why we created our #FightingForFamilies Week of Action: to highlight the work of state legislators who are taking on greedy special interests and fighting for people from all walks of life.

When it comes to education, health care, and raising incomes, the vast majority of policy change will happen on a state level.

And it is working! In New Jersey, a bill to increase the minimum wage to $15 was signed by Gov. Murphy and expanded paid leave (up to 12 weeks, from six) is already on his desk. And in North Carolina a bill was introduced last Friday to expand Medicaid and provide health care for more than 600,000 people.

These are not just progressive issues! Polling conducted in nearly a dozen states shows broad bipartisan support for economic issues like lowering cost of health care, investing in education, raising wages and increasing access to paid sick days.

This week also marks the 26th anniversary since the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was signed into law, guaranteeing many American workers unpaid time off from work to care for sick family members or to welcome a child through birth or adoption. While a majority of Americans understand that job security in the face of medical challenges is one of the things critical to make life better for working people, we know this federal measure falls short of what is needed for families to thrive. Today, state legislators are leading the fight for the next step: paid family and medical leave--because no one should have to choose between caring for a loved one and their paycheck.

And it’s not just paid family leave, across the country progressive state  lawmakers are advancing a progressive agenda that that centers the needs of working families – issues like paid sick days,, equal pay, expanding overtime pay, combatting wage theft, lowering the cost of prescription drugs, increasing access to affordable housing and raising the minimum wage.

Progressive state legislators, in conjunction with SiX, are showing what responsive, transparent and accountable government should look like. For example, state lawmakers in Ohio and West Virginia hosted Facebook live town halls, in Maryland, there was a “Fight for $15” press conference and progressive legislators in Minnesota hosted a press conference focused on wage theft. Legislators in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Maine, Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Maryland and Pennsylvania are hosting tele-town halls that will connect with tens of thousands of Americans this week. In states across the country, people are being heard and lawmakers are acting on the priorities that impact families most.

Federal gridlock might dominate the news, but working families can’t wait any longer for bold action. State legislatures show that a different and more immediate path is possible. Progressive state lawmakers demonstrate daily the power of an inclusive and accessible democracy, and the world should take note.

Jessie Ulibarri is the Executive Director of the State Innovation Exchange. Before this role, he served as a Colorado State Senator, where he represented the community in which he was raised, including the trailer park where he spent his earliest years of his life. He currently lives with his family in Pennsylvania.

States Are Fighting for Families by Advancing Paid Leave, Building Momentum Toward a National Policy

By Ellen Bravo and Vicki Shabo

Ellen Bravo is a co-founder and director of Family Values @ Work, a network of broad coalitions working for—and winning—policies such as paid sick days and family leave insurance.

Vicki Shabo is vice president for workplace policies and strategies at the National Partnership for Women & Families.

When the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) reached President Bill Clinton’s desk 26 years ago today, similar laws had already passed in multiple states. The FMLA was an important first step in transforming our workplaces and culture – and it wouldn’t have succeeded without state laws laying the groundwork for progress.

image 1
Advocates for paid family leave in New Jersey.

The FMLA has allowed millions of working people to manage their care responsibilities without risking a job or health coverage; and in 26 years it has been used more than 200 million times. Despite its popularity, it is clear: unpaid time is not enough. In fact, nearly 40 percent of the workforce is not eligible even for unpaid leave under the FMLA, and millions more simply cannot afford to take unpaid time away from their jobs. The need for paid family and medical leave will only grow as our workforce and population ages and the number of available family caregivers shrinks.

State legislators and the organizations that serve them, like the State Innovation Exchange, aren’t waiting around for federal lawmakers to address this looming crisis. Just as they led on unpaid leave, states are fighting for families again, acting as laboratories for paid family and medical leave programs. Today, paid family and medical leave laws are in place and working well in four states – California, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. State and citywide paid leave programs will soon be in place in the District of Columbia, Massachusetts and Washington as well. Each program is sustained through small payroll contributions from employers, workers or both, so people can draw a wage while providing care for themselves or a loved one.

Just weeks into new legislative sessions paid leave bills have been introduced in 20 state legislatures, including Virginia, Connecticut, Colorado, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Oregon and Vermont - all bolstered by broad and diverse coalitions.. Legislators have also filed policies in deep red states like Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma and West Virginia.

It is not surprising that lawmakers across party lines are eager to ensure working people in their states have access to paid leave given the positive outcomes the programs are yielding in states with established funds. Studies in Rhode Island and California found that the states’ paid leave programs help families care for a new child and arrange child care. Research on New Jersey’s paid leave program show that, for low-income families, mothers who use the paid leave program breastfeed longer than those who do not. These programs also help working people care for aging relatives. California’s statewide paid leave law is credited with reducing the use of nursing homes.

Businesses in states with paid leave laws benefit as well since paid time to care can have a positive impact on employee morale, increase productivity and improve employee retention, especially among workers who are paid low wages.

The state policies also provide guidance on designing policies that are more responsive to the needs of working people, especially people with jobs that pay lower-wages, communities of color and part-time workers. For example, state innovation shows that creating higher wage replacement rates for lower-wage workers; broadening the range of family members eligible to provide care to an ailing loved one; and ensuring that the jobs of part-time workers and employees of smaller companies are protected when they take leave are all essential to promoting program use, gender and racial equity and workers’ economic security.

While we celebrate state-level progress, and expect more victories in 2019, overall access to paid leave in this country remains far too rare. No matter where they live or work, everyone deserves time to care for themselves or a loved one without risking their economic security. Yet only 17 percent of all working people have paid family leave through their job and less than 40 percent have personal medical leave through an employer-provided short-term disability program. Disparities in access to paid leave between lower- and higher-wage workers are actually growing.

Working families in the United States need a national paid family and medical leave policy that covers all working people for the full range of caregiving needs reflected in the FMLA; provides a meaningful duration of leave and a substantial share of their wages; protects workers from retaliation for taking leave; and is sustainably funded without harming other essential government programs. The Family And Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act is the only federal proposal that aligns with these criteria. Members of Congress should support the FAMILY Act to strengthen our nation’s families, businesses and the economy.

As federal lawmakers work toward paid leave for all, we urge them to look to state paid leave models, research and best practices. Every statewide law proposed, every expansion considered and every bill signed builds momentum toward a strong, comprehensive national paid family and medical leave policy.

Statement from the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council on the 46th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

The Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council is the only national, cross-state cohort of pro-choice state legislators in the country, with 326 members from 46 states. The RFLC is a project of State Innovation Exchange (SiX).

The 46th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision Roe v. Wade comes at a critical time in our country. While we are experiencing a hostile federal government and a highly-politicized judiciary comprised of opponents of reproductive rights and justice who are emboldened to test the powers of their political reach, we also see the rising of voters and elected officials intent on centering the clear majority of Americans who support our constitutional right to reproductive freedom.

As a cohort of 326 state legislators from 46 states, we recognize the urgency of this moment and the obligation we have to protect our constitutional right to abortion, to recognize where the rights established under Roe v. Wade have fallen short for many of our communities, and to take action to ensure all people can access the reproductive health care they need with dignity and respect. Where some see a political opportunity to erode or dismantle Roe v. Wade, we see a duty to fight back against the ongoing assaults on our rights and a chance to re-envision what reproductive health, rights, and justice should look like in the United States.

While abortion has been legal for 46 years, anti-abortion politicians have already pushed abortion out of reach for poor women, young people, and people of color by enacting more than one thousand state-level restrictions in that time. States have a choice. We can align with those who wish to take us backwards and criminalize a health care procedure that nearly one in four women will receive in her lifetime, or we can rise to reclaim our government for the people and in pursuit of gender, racial, and economic justice, including reproductive health care and rights for all. We won't just fight back against the ongoing assaults, but will fight for more than the protections established in Roe v. Wade. We will create a future where all Americans, have access to reproductive care.

Our country is at a crossroads. We boldly accept the challenge before us. We commit to raising our voices and using our platforms as state legislators to continue advancing the reproductive health care services that our communities deserve, in 2019 and beyond.

Signed,

Legislators in the Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council

Representative Geran Tarr Alaska
Representative Isela Blanc Arizona
Senator Andrea Dalessandro Arizona
Representative Rosanna Gabaldon Arizona
Representative Daniel Hernandez Arizona
Senator Juan Mendez Arizona
Representative Athena Salman Arizona
Senator Joyce Elliott Arkansas
Representative Vivian Flowers Arkansas
Assemblyman David Chiu California
Assemblymember Laura Friedman California
Majority Leader KC Becker Colorado
Senator Lois Court Colorado
Senator Jessie Danielson Colorado
Representative Daneya Esgar Colorado
Senator Steve Fenberg Colorado
Senator Rhonda Fields Colorado
Senator Joann Ginal Colorado
Representative Chris Hansen Colorado
Representative Leslie Herod Colorado
Representative Edie Hooton Colorado
Representative Dominique Jackson Colorado
Senator Pete Lee Colorado
Representative Susan Lontine Colorado
Representative Barbara McLachlan Colorado
Representative Dafna Michaelson Jenet Colorado
Senator Brittany Pettersen Colorado
Representative Mike Weissman Colorado
Majority Leader Bob Duff Connecticut
Representative Joshua Elliott Connecticut
Senator Mae Flexer Connecticut
Representative Jillian Gilchrest Connecticut
Representative Gregory Haddad Connecticut
Representative Susan Johnson Connecticut
Representative Roland Lemar Connecticut
Senator Matthew Lesser Connecticut
Senator Marilyn Moore Connecticut
Representative Caroline Simmons Connecticut
Representative Edwin Vargas Connecticut
Representative Paul Baumbach Delaware
Senator Lori Berman Florida
Representative Anna Eskamani Florida
Senator Gloria Butler Georgia
Representative Park Cannon Georgia
Representative Patricia Park Gardner Georgia
Representative Deborah Gonzalez Georgia
Representative Sheila Jones Georgia
Representative Dar'shun Kendrick Georgia
Representative Bee Nguyen Georgia
Senator Nan Orrock Georgia
Representative Kim Schofield Georgia
Representative Renitta Shannon Georgia
Senator Nikema Williams Georgia
Senator Rosalyn Baker Hawaii
Representative Della Au Belatti Hawaii
Senator Donna Mercado Kim Hawaii
Representative Nicole Lowen Hawaii
Representative Roy Takumi Hawaii
Representative Sue Chew Idaho
Representative Carol Ammons Illinois
Senator Omar Aquino Illinois
Representative Kelly Cassidy Illinois
Representative Sara Feigenholtz Illinois
Senator Laura Fine Illinois
Representative Robyn Gabel Illinois
Representative Jehan Gordon-Booth Illinois
Representative Will Guzzardi Illinois
Senator Don Harmon Illinois
Representative Greg Harris Illinois
Senator Mattie Hunter Illinois
Senator Toi Hutchinson Illinois
Representative Camille Lilly Illinois
Representative Theresa Mah Illinois
Representative Robert Martwick Illinois
Representative Rita Mayfield Illinois
Representative Anna Moeller Illinois
Senator Elgie Sims Illinois
Senator Heather Steans Illinois
Senator Patricia Van Pelt-Watkins Illinois
Representative Emanuel "Chris" Welch Illinois
Representative Ann Williams Illinois
Representative Sam Yingling Illinois
Representative Marti Anderson Iowa
Representative Liz Bennett Iowa
Senator Joe Bolkcom Iowa
Representative Vicki Lensing Iowa
Representative Dennis "Boog" Highberger Kansas
Representative Annie Kuether Kansas
Representative Joni Jenkins Kentucky
Representative Mary Lou Marzian Kentucky
Representative Attica Woodson Scott Kentucky
Senator Shenna Bellows Maine
Senator Catherine Breen Maine
Representative Dale Denno Maine
Representative Donna Doore Maine
Representative Michelle Dunphy Maine
Representative Richard Farnsworth Maine
Representative Drew Gattine Maine
Speaker Sara Gideon Maine
Representative James Handy Maine
Representative Erik Jorgensen Maine
Representative Jay McCreight Maine
Senator Rebecca Millett Maine
Senator Dave Miramant Maine
Representative Matt Moonen Maine
Representative Margaret O'Neil Maine
Representative Lois Reckitt Maine
Representative Deane Rykerson Maine
Representative Rachel Talbot Ross Maine
Representative Denise Tepler Maine
Representative Charlotte Warren Maine
Delegate Shelly Hettleman Maryland
Senator Cheryl Kagan Maryland
Delegate Ariana Kelly Maryland
Delegate Robbyn Lewis Maryland
Delegate Karen Lewis Young Maryland
Delegate Brooke Lierman Maryland
Delegate David Moon Maryland
Delegate Pamela Queen Maryland
Delegate Ana Sol-Gutierrez Maryland
Delegate Jheanelle Wilkins Maryland
Senator Mike Barrett Massachusetts
Representative Carmine Gentile Massachusetts
Representative Patricia Haddad Massachusetts
Representative Natalie Higgins Massachusetts
Representative Jack Patrick Lewis Massachusetts
Representative David Linsky Massachusetts
Representative Jay Livingstone Massachusetts
Representative Tram T. Nguyen Massachusetts
Representative Alice Peisch Massachusetts
Representative Denise Provost Massachusetts
Senator Becca Rausch Massachusetts
Representative Lindsay Sabadosa Massachusetts
Minority Leader Jim Ananich Michigan
Senator Winnie Brinks Michigan
Minority Floor Leader Stephanie Chang Michigan
Senator Erika Geiss Michigan
Minority Leader Christine Greig Michigan
Senator Curtis Hertel Michigan
Representative Kara Hope Michigan
Senator Jeff Irwin Michigan
Representative Donna Lasinski Michigan
Senator Jeremy Moss Michigan
Representative Kristy Pagan Michigan
Representative Rebekah Warren Michigan
Representative Robert Wittenberg Michigan
Representative Jamie Becker-Finn Minnesota
Representative Raymond Dehn Minnesota
Senator D. Scott Dibble Minnesota
Representative Mike Freiberg Minnesota
Representative Frank Hornstein Minnesota
Speaker Melissa Hortman Minnesota
Representative Fue Lee Minnesota
Representative Carlos Mariani Minnesota
Representative Sandra Masin Minnesota
Representative Rena Moran Minnesota
Representative Liz Olson Minnesota
Senator Sandy Pappas Minnesota
Representative Dave Pinto Minnesota
Representative Kathy Sykes Mississippi
Representative Richard Brown Missouri
Representative Sarah Unsicker Missouri
Representative Cora Faith Walker Missouri
Representative Mary Caferro Montana
Representative Mary Ann Dunwell Montana
Representative Jessica Karjala Montana
Representative Andrea Olsen Montana
Senator Jennifer Pomnichowski Montana
Senator Diane Sands Montana
Senator Frank Smith Montana
Senator Sara Howard Nebraska
Assemblywoman Sarah Peters Nevada
Senator Julia Ratti Nevada
Assemblywoman Ellen Spiegel Nevada
Assemblyman Steven Yeager Nevada
Representative Susan Almy New Hampshire
Representative Debra Altschiller New Hampshire
Representative Christy Bartlett New Hampshire
Representative Amanda Bouldin New Hampshire
Representative Renny Cushing New Hampshire
Representative Edith DesMarais New Hampshire
Representative Charlotte DiLorenzo New Hampshire
Representative Daniel Eaton New Hampshire
Senator Martha Fuller Clark New Hampshire
Representative Chuck Grassie New Hampshire
Representative Timothy Horrigan New Hampshire
Representative Mark King New Hampshire
Representative Peter Leishman New Hampshire
Representative Patricia Lovejoy New Hampshire
Representative Sharon Nordgren New Hampshire
Representative Allison Nutting-Wong New Hampshire
Representative Lee Oxenham New Hampshire
Representative Marjorie Porter New Hampshire
Representative Katherine Rogers New Hampshire
Senator Cindy Rosenwald New Hampshire
Representative Kris Schultz New Hampshire
Minority Leader Stephen Shurtleff New Hampshire
Senator David Watters New Hampshire
Assemblyman Raj Mukherji New Jersey
Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle New Jersey
Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg New Jersey
Representative Deborah Armstrong New Mexico
Representative Andrea Romero New Mexico
Senator Elizabeth Stefanics New Mexico
Senator Mimi Stewart New Mexico
Representative Elizabeth Thomson New Mexico
Representative Christine Trujillo New Mexico
Assemblymember David Buchwald New York
Assemblymember Deborah Glick New York
Assemblymember Richard Gottfried New York
Senator Liz Krueger New York
Assemblymember Felix Ortiz New York
Assemblymember Dan Quart New York
Senator Gustavo Rivera New York
Assemblymember Nily Rozic New York
Assemblymember JoAnne Simon New York
Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins New York
Assemblymember Latrice M. Walker New York
Representative Johnnie Newton Autry North Carolina
Representative Sydney Batch North Carolina
Representative Mary Belk North Carolina
Representative Cecil Brockman North Carolina
Representative Deb Butler North Carolina
Senator Jay Chaudhuri North Carolina
Representative Christy Clark North Carolina
Representative Susan Fisher North Carolina
Senator Valerie Foushee North Carolina
Representative Rosa Gill North Carolina
Representative Pricey Harrison North Carolina
Representative Verla Insko North Carolina
Senator Floyd McKissick North Carolina
Representative Graig Meyer North Carolina
Representative Marcia Morey North Carolina
Senator Terry Van Duyn North Carolina
Representative Julie Von Haefen North Carolina
Senator Mike Woodard North Carolina
Senator Nickie Antonio Ohio
Representative Erica Crawley Ohio
Representative Tavia Galonski Ohio
Representative Stephanie Howse Ohio
Representative Adam Miller Ohio
Representative Kent Smith Ohio
Representative Emilia Strong Sykes Ohio
Representative Thomas West Ohio
Representative Emily Virgin Oklahoma
Representative Julie Fahey Oregon
Senator Lew Frederick Oregon
Senator Sara Gelser Oregon
Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson Oregon
Representative Carla Piluso Oregon
Representative Karin Power Oregon
Majority Leader Jennifer Williamson Oregon
Representative Brad Witt Oregon
Representative Tim Briggs Pennsylvania
Senator Maria Collett Pennsylvania
Representative Carolyn Comitta Pennsylvania
Representative Mary Jo Daley Pennsylvania
Representative Tina Davis Pennsylvania
Representative Austin Davis Pennsylvania
Minority Leader Frank Dermody Pennsylvania
Representative Dan Frankel Pennsylvania
Representative Ed Gainey Pennsylvania
Senator Art Haywood Pennsylvania
Representative Sara Innamorato Pennsylvania
Representative Leanne Krueger-Braneky Pennsylvania
Representative Summer Lee Pennsylvania
Representative Steve McCarter Pennsylvania
Senator Katie Muth Pennsylvania
Representative Chris Rabb Pennsylvania
Representative Mike Schlossberg Pennsylvania
Representative Peter Schweyer Pennsylvania
Senator Lindsey Williams Pennsylvania
Representative Edith Ajello Rhode Island
Senator Dawn Euer Rhode Island
Senator Gayle Goldin Rhode Island
Representative Evan Shanley Rhode Island
Representative Teresa Tanzi Rhode Island
Representative Gilda Cobb-Hunter South Carolina
Representative John King South Carolina
Senator Margie Bright Matthews South Carolina
Representative Steven McCleerey South Dakota
Senator Susan Wismer South Dakota
Representative G.A. Hardaway Tennessee
Representative Jessica Farrar Texas
Representative Mary Gonzalez Texas
Representative Jennifer Dailey-Provost Utah
Representative Elizabeth Weight Utah
Representative Tim Briglin Vermont
Majority Leader Sarah Copeland Hanzas Vermont
Representative Maxine Grad Vermont
Majority Leader Jill Krowinski Vermont
Representative James McCullough Vermont
Representative Mike Mrowicki Vermont
Representative Ann Pugh Vermont
Representative Barbara Rachelson Vermont
Delegate Jennifer Boysko Virginia
Senator Barbara Favola Virginia
Delegate Eileen Filler-Corn Virginia
Delegate Elizabeth Guzman Virginia
Delegate Mark Keam Virginia
Delegate Kaye Kory Virginia
Senator Jennifer McClellan Virginia
Delegate Marcia Price Virginia
Representative Eileen Cody Washington
Senator Jeannie Darneille Washington
Representative Beth Doglio Washington
Representative Joe Fitzgibbon Washington
Senator Karen Keiser Washington
Senator Emily Randall Washington
Representative Mike Sells Washington
Representative Tana Senn Washington
Representative Derek Stanford Washington
Representative Gael Tarleton Washington
Senator Lisa Wellman Washington
Senator Claire Wilson Washington
Delegate Danielle Walker West Virginia
Senator Janet Bewley Wisconsin
Senator LaTonya Johnson Wisconsin
Representative Debra Kolste Wisconsin
Senator Chris Larson Wisconsin
Representative Melissa Sargent Wisconsin
Representative Christine Sinicki Wisconsin
Representative Lisa Subeck Wisconsin
Representative Chris Taylor Wisconsin
Representative JoCasta Zamarripa Wisconsin
Representative Cathy Connolly Wyoming

#FightingForFamilies Week of Action: Feb 4-8, 2019

The annual SiX #FightingForFamiliesWeek of Action is a national, coordinated effort to highlight the work of progressive state legislators to create an economy that works for all, not just the wealthy few. The next Week of Action will be February 4-8, 2019.

WHY YOU SHOULD JOIN

Join a national movement to highlight the work of progressive state legislators to ensure every American can thrive and support their families. By joining the week of action, you are helping to build a national movement of progressive leaders and demonstrating the positive momentum behind progressive policies that make life better for working people by investing in education; creating better-paying jobs; making health care more affordable; and advancing economic security for all. 

co fightingforfamilies nbc pic
Colorado state legislators during 2018’s
Week of Action.

2018’s #FightingForFamilies Week of Action engaged over 200 state legislators from all 50 states, earned national and local media attention, reached 14.6 million users on social media, reached nearly 100,000 people through telephone town halls, and engaged more than 30 partner organizations.

Join together with progressives across the nation and make 2019’s Week of Action even stronger.

HOW YOU CAN JOIN

Reach out to woa@stateinnovation.org to sign up today. We will continue to send information and resources to the SiX legislator network to explain how you and your legislative colleagues can engage. As in years past, below are some examples of actions you can take to join this effort:

Get creative—Let us know how you want to engage! Reach out to woa@stateinnovation.org.

South Carolina State Senator Margie Bright Matthews: Legislatures Are Ground Zero in Fight for Abortion Access

margie

Published in The State September 14, 2018. See the original post here.

As Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings wrap up and Roe v. Wade remains at risk, my colleagues and I in state legislatures across the country have our work cut out for us in defending the rights and reproductive health care for women and families. In states supportive of abortion access, it’s time to repeal bad laws that threaten abortion access if Roe is overturned.

Unfortunately, some of us working in states like South Carolina may not hold enough votes to defeat bad bills. But we do have the resolve to exercise our rights and the responsibility to defend our constituents.

That’s why I joined my colleagues last session on the floor of the state Senate for an 11-hour filibuster against a bill that would have banned the majority of safe and legal abortions. Ultimately, the bill died, and we never tired in our fight to stop South Carolina from becoming the latest state to enact bogus legislation at the expense of women.

We can’t standby and watch more state legislatures undo the progress we’ve made in this country. The Reproductive Freedom Leadership Council — a coalition of more than 300 legislators lead by the State Innovation Exchange is one group fighting back, and I was proud to join them in opposing Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination.

I am heartened by people in South Carolina and nationwide who have voiced opposition to attacks on abortion. The people of this country believe in women’s rights. And we’ll fight with everything we have to protect them.

By: Sen. Margie Bright Matthew
Senate District 45

Are the Best States for Workers Also the Best States for Business?

By: Michelle Sternthal, Senior Domestic Policy Advisor, Oxfam America

Popular rhetoric in the U.S. pits workers against businesses. How often does one hear, “Worker protections saddle businesses and stall the economy! Increasing the minimum wage will scare away businesses! Regulations kill jobs!” In so many policy conversations, we are told that labor laws must be sacrificed to achieve a stable and sound economy. This excuse is often trotted out by federal lawmakers as they squash laws that would provide paid sick days, paid family leave, or minimum wage increases to working Americans.

Luckily, state lawmakers across the country have rejected this false choice between being pro-worker and pro-business. They know—and an impressive body of evidence confirms—that economies thrive when businesses invest in their workers and their workplaces. Increasing wages reduces employee turnover, cuts employers’ costs, and increases worker purchasing power. Providing paid sick days keeps employees healthy and productive. Ensuring that workplace environments are free from discrimination helps keep talented women and people of color in the workplace, increasing productivity and diversifying work environments.

Oxfam America’s newly released Best States to Work Index confirms just this. In this new ranking of states, Oxfam examined 11 different labor policies across the fifty states and Washington, D.C.  The index broke down these policies into three domains:  wages, worker protections, and the right to organize. States were ranked and given an overall score, in addition to scores for each domain. An interactive map enables users to explore each state in depth.

What Oxfam found: Washington, D.C., ranks first in the nation in worker-friendliness and neighboring Virginia ranks last. Washington state, California and Massachusetts appear at the top, while Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi are at the bottom.

But the report also examined how scores on the index correlated with indicators of overall wellbeing in the states. We found that the states that scored higher in the index were more likely to have a higher median income, higher labor force participation, and greater GDP per capita. They were also the states with better health outcomes—lower infant mortality rates and longer life expectancies. While correlation is not causality, this evidence suggests that labor policies, at the least, are not damaging to the economy or the health of the population, and that they may in fact support them.

Also striking, three of our top performing states on the index were ranked by U.S. News and World Report as the states with the best business environments, with California, Massachusetts, and Washington scoring #1, #2, and #4, respectively.

Our index illustrates what so many policymakers and state advocates already know: good jobs that treat workers well are not just good for employees, but good for businesses, and good for the state.

Despite progress in some states, policymakers still have their work cut out for them. According to our index, many states still lag in worker protection policies. Although the majority of states have made progress on basic equal pay legislation and on a basic sexual harassment law, not enough have passed paid sick leave, paid family leave, and fair scheduling laws.  And many states have a ways to go to pass a wage law that begins to meet the needs of working families in their state.

Instead of heeding the fear-mongering about supposed economic catastrophes caused by sound labor laws, we need bold leadership by state policymakers to champion a comprehensive worker rights agenda.  This Labor Day, we are counting on progressive state leaders to take up this mantel.

Are you a state legislator interested in working on these issues? Contact info@stateinnovation.org to get connected with resources and support.

 

Legislator Spotlight: Maine Rep. Ryan Fecteau 

Maine Rep. Ryan Fecteau HeadshotTo honor and acknowledge June as LGBT Pride Month, SiX is highlighting the work and leadership on issues affecting LGBT communities with a Member Spotlight of Rep. Ryan Fecteau from Maine. Across the country, state legislators are introducing bans on the practice of so-called “conversion therapy” which seeks to change a person’s gender identity or sexual orientation. Rep. Fecteau championed a conversion therapy ban for minors in Maine this session, which after successful votes in the House and the Senate is still awaiting a few final procedural hurdles to passage. 

Rep. Fecteau lives in Biddeford, Maine, and represents the 11th legislative district in the Maine House of Representatives. SiX recently spoke to him about his work to ban exposing minors to conversion therapy, a cruel and outdated practice that seeks to change one’s sexual orientation. Watch Rep. Fecteau’s speech on the House floor about his personal connection to the legislation here.  

What originally made you want to run for office? 

I discovered the power of change making and grassroots advocacy when I was a senior in high school. Biddeford High School was, quite literally, falling apart. There was water infiltration, an entire facade leaking energy, and furniture purchased in the 1960s. The city council was considering a $34 million renovation bond proposal and it needed approval from a majority of Biddeford voters. So, though I would not ultimately benefit from the proposal's passage, I led fellow students in a campaign to show our community what it was like to go to a school in disrepair. The proposal earned the support of two out of three voters in Biddeford.  

In 2014, I graduated from The Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., and decided to run for the open state house seat in Biddeford. I did so with seniors and young people in mind. Maine is one of the oldest states in the nation. And while our population grows older, too many young people, including many of my friends, leave for opportunities elsewhere. Young people leaving has consequences for seniors. The state funds health coverage, prescription drug cost reduction, heating assistance, and much more for our seniors. In order to fund such programs, there needs to be a population that is working and contributing to the wellbeing of our entire citizenry. As a 21-year-old at the time of my first election, I felt like I could bring a unique perspective to solving these issues in a legislature with an average age of 55. 

What have you found was the most unexpected or rewarding part about becoming a legislator? 

It was certainly not unexpected, because I discovered it knocking doors and talking to voters over the phone during the election: the human connection. I have the opportunity every single day to be a champion for the people in my community. There is nothing more rewarding than helping someone solve a problem or propel their solution. 

You have been working to ban conversion therapy in Maine. Why is this an important issue to you? Tell us about sharing your personal story on the House floor. 

In 2012, I met with a school administrator, a man I trusted, about my work with a student group to combat the high rates of suicide by LGBTQ youth. We had met many times before, but this time the tone shifted dramatically. “Suicide affects everyone, not just LGBTQ people,” the administrator declared, as though the student LGBT group’s argument that administrators should support its existence to help combat the higher rates of rejection-fueled suicide in the LGBTQ community was divisive. He abruptly continued, “One day, I hope you’ll see beyond your gay identity and take in what life has to offer you.” I was stunned into silence. The administrator added, “I recommend you read Beyond Gay by David Morrison.”  

I left the meeting, sprinted across campus to my friends, and together we Google-searched the book. The description was a gut punch.  My confidence in this administrator evaporated and was replaced by feelings of fear and self-loathing. The recommended book encouraged “reparative therapy,” otherwise known as so-called “conversion therapy.” I wrote in an email to a friend, “I spent the next night crying. I am not one to shed tears often, let alone cry hysterically. Yet on this night, the night before returning home for summer break, I cried hysterically in the arms of my friends.”  

I returned to the university in the fall and continued to lead the student LGBTQ organization.  I carried the weight of that earlier meeting and struggled with mental exhaustion. Winter break arrived and my dad came to pick me up. Looking out the window, as trees flew by on the highway, I, for the first time in my life, contemplated my continued existence. I had this internal discussion, almost as if there were two voices, concerning whether or not I ought to be alive. It tormented me for the duration of winter break. I was an openly gay young man who was finding my way in life, who had found the guts to come out to my parents, and the confidence to lead a LGBTQ student organization, become student body president, and work as paid staff on a marriage equality campaign. But I could not shake the self-hatred, unworthiness and haunting message that I was broken after this trusted university administrator told me, in essence, to seek “reparative therapy”—to be “beyond gay.”  

I spent a long time denying that I had this experience. There is nothing more painstaking than to admit that you’ve contemplated suicide. It was only something I had said aloud to someone a few times before presenting this bill to my colleagues in Augusta. I am so lucky and grateful to have persevered with the help of so many other supportive persons in my life. I am so thankful to be in Augusta, as a state legislator, to advocate for the bill, because I know there are young people who are far more vulnerable than I was back then. I want to protect them from the harm that would come from a trusted professional telling them, one way or another, that they are broken, that the core truth of who they are is wrong and even disgusting. 

What reaction did you receive for sharing your story? 

I was overwhelmed by words of encouragement from my colleagues in the House. Unfortunately, the tone of the floor debate overall was bitter. It was the most gut-wrenching day I've experienced as a legislator. At one point, a Republican lawmaker declared gay people performed "unnatural acts." It concluded with a completely partisan vote.  

What additional issues are you most passionate about? 

I am passionate about career and technical education. The days of funneling every high school student into a “college or bust” mentality must end, especially in Maine. We have industries where workers are quickly nearing retirement age. One of the issues I heard on the campaign trail in 2016 most often was, "I can't get a plumber to do this small job." There are good-paying industries with huge needs. Maine is lucky to have 16 career and technical education schools connected to our high schools. Unfortunately, we have not made a statewide investment in these schools since 1998. I've sponsored legislation to do so. 

Anything else you would like readers to know? What's a fun fact about yourself readers may not know?

I have this awesome four-legged daughter named Pancake and she is waiting for her chance to succeed me in the legislature. 

Follow Pancake and Rep. Fecteau on Facebook at  @Fecteau4Biddeford and Twitter at @Fecteau4Biddeford 

Legislator Spotlight: Virginia Del. Marcia Price

Virginia Delegate Marcia Price Headshot

Del. Price represents the 95th legislative district in the Virginia House of Delegates, covering parts of the cities of Newport News and Hampton. SiX spoke to her about her work helping Virginians address student loan debt.  

Why is combatting the student debt crisis an important issue to you? 

Everyone brings their life experiences with them to their work as a legislator and tries to mesh that with the experiences of people in their district. For me personally, when I was elected to the legislature, I was carrying about $90,000 in student loan debt from undergrad and two graduate programs. I spent a lot of time thinking I had done something wrong, but I also heard about other people going through the same thing. It became clear that getting this right wasn’t just the personal responsibility of the borrower, it was a systematic problem. When I got to the legislature in 2016, I knew that my district had a large percentage of defaults on loans. I realized that I could tell my personal story, and even if a bill couldn’t help me it could help other people from being in situations like mine.  

How will your bill, HB1138, passed in 2018, help Virginians?   

It creates an Office of the Qualified Education Loan Ombudsman within the State Council of Higher Education, where Virginia borrowers can go for unbiased information. A lot of people have pieced together different types of loans to cover their full need, so instead of having to go to multiple servicers to get answers to their questions, they can now go to one place and get answers on all types of loans. They can also get answers on repayment options from someone who won’t be making money off their decision, but from someone who can aid them in making choices that are economical. The Ombudsman office can also walk Virginians through the process of filing a complaint if things aren’t going well with a loan servicer, which can be really intimidating when you’re up against such a big industry. And finally, the office will create an easily accessible online educational course for borrowers and potential borrowers. 

What are the next steps the legislature can do to address student loan debt?  

There are three other bills we’ll keep pressing for that will be helpful on the front end, as people are considering taking out loans. First, I think it’s time that Virginia be creative and move forward with a student loan refinancing authority for people with high interest loans, so they can refinance with lower interest rates. Some private loans come with interest rates that really look more like department store credit card rates, more so than an interest rate for a loan for an education that you were told you had to have in order to be successful. Two other bills would create a borrower’s bill of rights and making sure loan servicer companies have to be licensed by the state. In Virginia, student loan debt is second only to mortgage debt, and mortgages are highly regulated. Student loans are also often targeting people who are much younger than home buyers, raising the possibility that they could be taken advantage of.  

What else should people know about the student debt issue? 

I do want to clarify that when it comes to my own student loan situation, I know I could have done a better job reading my own student loan documents. But I also know that some of us never learned even how to balance a checkbook. We’ve taken some things out of our education curriculum, like financial literacy, that would help students be financially savvy and budget savvy and make an informed decision before they sign their life away. That’s my little plug against over-emphasizing standardized tests and putting some life skills back into curriculum that have real-life applications.   

What other issues are you passionate about? 

In the area where I’m from, everyday gun violence is the reality, and I’m really passionate about a four-pronged approach to prevent and eradicate youth and gang violence in my district: Prevention, intervention, enforcement, and re-entry. On my first day as a delegate in 2016 we had three murders in Newport News. By the time we got to the weekend for my ceremonial swearing-in, we were at five murders. Too many of the victims were under the age of 30. We’ve got to break the cycle of violence, break the prison -industrial complex, and end mass incarceration. I’m passionate about criminal justice reform, but most specifically, trying to get this next generation to have a sense of hope, a sense of purpose, and a pipeline toward success.  

The Virginia legislature is part-time, and only in session for a few months out of the year. How do you spend your time outside the legislature?  

I’m the director of a non-profit called Virginia BLOC, the Black Leadership Organizing Collaborative. It is a project of New Virginia Majority, and we are focused on building empowered communities in Newport News and Hampton and building African American political power. We help communities create the changes they hope to see. It’s pretty much what I do as a delegate, but I get to do it outside of the legislature. 

What first motivated you to run for office?  

I’m a fourth-generation resident of Newport News, and was born into a political family and I had been part of campaigns since I was three, literally.I had always been on the campaign side, but in 2014 my predecessor in the legislature unofficially announced her retirement at a cookout. I went to a community meeting to volunteer myself as campaign manager for whoever the nominee would end up being, but it turned out that everyone at that meeting was there to tell me why I should run. It was very humbling. I was 34 at the time. I started coming up with all the reasons why I couldn’t do it, and people were pointing out why I should, like being a young, energetic voice for an area that needs a strong advocate. The positives outweighed my concerns, so I declared my candidacy.  

What is a fun fact about you readers may not know? 

I went to Divinity School at Howard University and was on track to become a minister that would pastor a church. But, during my certification process I was working in a hospital in a chaplaincy program where they assigned me to pediatrics, labor and delivery, and the emergency department. I learned really quickly that dealing with the end of life, when the end of life was in such negative circumstances, I didn’t want to be there for that part. I wanted to be somewhere where my ministry could help prevent the negative circumstances, and I really do see my work in the community as a legislator and at a non-profit as a form of ministry.  

Legislator Spotlight: Pennsylvania Rep. Leanne Krueger-Braneky

C53A03505b15dRep. Krueger-Braneky represents the 161st legislative district in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. SiX spoke to her about her work to combat sexual harassment. 

- Why is addressing sexual harassment and assault an important issue to you?

As more reports of sexual harassment have come to light, it’s become clear that our current system does not support survivors. As an elected official, I’ve shared my own #MeToo story. Afterwards, women who work in our state Capitol approached me to share stories of inappropriate behavior by legislators and their experience of a system which silences them on the issue. We need to take action now to ensure a fair and transparent system for handling complaints—independent of politics. From fast food workers to the State House, all employees should feel safe at work.

- How would the laws proposed this year combat sexual harassment?
Pennsylvania HB 1965, or what is better known as the #MeToo State House Act, is a piece of legislation that, among other things, protects staff and interns, puts in place reform procedures for investigation, resolution of complaints, improves training and transparency of sexual harassment prevention and response training in employment. My bill is part of a broader package of bills introduced by women in the PA House and Senate to tackle broader issues around sexual harassment and assault.

- How has the #MeToo movement impacted your work on this issue?

Last December, following horrific revelations about high-profile figures that launched the newest phase of the #MeToo movement, the House Democratic and Republican caucuses underwent sexual harassment training for the first time. A human resources professional walked us through slides showing examples of inappropriate and unprofessional conduct and behavior, as well as the criteria for a hostile work environment. I realized I had been subjected to each one of the hostile workplace behaviors—from inappropriate touching to sexual language to comments about my appearance—from colleagues on both sides of the aisle. And what I’ve heard from female staff and lobbyists in the Capitol is much worse than what I have experienced. We must shine a light on what’s happening and change the current culture that punishes survivors and forces them to live in shame and secrecy.

- What else can the state do to combat sexual harassment and sexual assault?

I’m grateful to the members of the Pittsburgh City Council and the Philadelphia City Council for supporting HB 1965 and understanding the need to hold the powerful accountable and create a better environment for everyone working at the state Capitol. Their support, while appreciated, is not enough. We need a vote on HB 1965—and the broader package of related bills—in the State House.

- What other issues are you working on? What are you most passionate about?

My top three priorities in office are ensuring that public schools have adequate funding to provide a thorough and efficient education to all children, protecting our environment, and un-rigging the economy so that locally owned businesses and working families can get ahead.

- Is there anything else you would like readers to know?

Sexual harassment in the workplace has garnered much attention in recent months because the victims have been women privileged with the ability—financial or otherwise—to tell their stories. It’s important that we not forget that women, disproportionately women of color, make up 60 percent of minimum-wage employees. This means that many women lack the economic power to reject misconduct in the workplace. Ending sexual harassment in the workplace is an issue of economic freedom—regardless of a person’s gender identity, they ought to be respected and feel safe at work.

SiX spoke to Rep. Salman and Rep. Herod about efforts to address the dignity that incarcerated women deserve.

Arizona State Representative Athena Salman is making global news with her efforts to secure access to an unlimited, free supply of feminine hygiene products for the state’s incarcerated women, who are currently limited to 12 sanitary pads per month. Rep. Salman’s work on this was inspired in part by similar efforts in Colorado in 2017, led by Colorado State Representative Leslie Herod. SiX spoke to Rep. Salman and Rep. Herod about these efforts to address the dignity that incarcerated women deserve.

SiX: Tell us about Arizona House Bill 2222 and how it inspired a recent policy change from the Department of Corrections.

AZ Rep. Athena Salman: Today, there are nearly 1.3 million women in the U.S Correctional System. Women are the fastest growing prison demographic in our country and in Arizona, we have roughly 4,000 women in state prison. My bill, HB2222, aimed to guarantee unlimited feminine hygiene products free of charge for incarcerated women.

At the time of the bill’s introduction, women in state prison were only receiving 12 pads a month and would have to buy additional menstrual products at the store once they were out. Women in prison make 15 cents an hour and a box of tampons at the store costs $3.99. Women were literally being faced with having to choose between buying more menstrual products or paying for phone calls to their children.

At the committee hearing, the Warden of the Perryville Prison (our only female facility) testified that the bill was “a solution looking for a problem.” Following her testimony, former female inmates told their powerful personal stories that brought to light the many abuses they had endured while being incarcerated. State, national and even international outrage and media coverage ensued, driven by the trending social media hashtag #LetItFlow.

The committee hearing for the bill sparked a movement and that momentum forced an immediate policy change from the Department of Corrections. Now, women will receive 36 pads a month. Last week, the Department announced that it will also be revising its policy to include tampons. While the policy changes are a huge short-term victory, the danger that we see is that correctional departments across the country could then use this as a foundation for fighting against codifying the policy into statute. We know that internal rule changes do not hold the same teeth as state statute and nothing prevents the department from changing the policy back a year later or under new leadership. So, the debate still continues in Arizona and beyond.

What inspired you to work on this issue?

Rep. Salman: At a conference last summer, Colorado State Rep. Leslie Herod informed me that she had just fought for free tampons for women in Colorado prisons. I was shocked that this was being denied to women in the first place, and when I began asking questions at home, I learned that the same problem existed in Arizona. I spoke with attorneys who monitored our prisons, prison reform advocates and formerly incarcerated women and felt absolutely certain that this was an issue worth tackling head on.

Why do you think this bill has resonated so deeply with people across Arizona and beyond?

Rep. Salman: This issue resonated far and wide because it speaks to the fundamental dignity of being a woman. To deny a woman of adequate feminine hygiene products for her menstrual cycle is cruel, and as women, we can empathize with how awful that must be to face that as your daily reality.

What else would you like readers from other states to know?

Rep. Salman: In fighting to make change, it was critical that I had a broad coalition of stakeholders and activists fighting for this issue publicly, and media attention as well. Anyone interested in prison reform, I encourage you to reach out to #cut50. It’s a national network that exclusively specializes on these issues.

Colorado State Representative Leslie Herod, what challenges did you face in pushing this policy in Colorado in 2017?

CO Rep. Leslie Herod: First and foremost, it was difficult to get the Colorado Department of Corrections to take the issue seriously. While I found it personally abhorrent that women had to “prove a medical need” before receiving additional pads, the DOC thought that was a perfectly rational policy. Additionally, the requirement that women pay $8 for a box of tampons while only making less than $1 or $2 a day was equally astonishing.

Men, who of course make up the majority of the legislature and upper leadership within in the Department of Corrections, simply feel unconformable discussing women's “issues” while at the same time, deciding on policies that impact women. That must change.

To be fair, I did get support from male colleagues and Governor Hickenlooper, but I know they wouldn't have raised the issue if I hadn’t. And I’m sure it wouldn’t have made it through the process without the support of the lone female Joint Budget Committee member, Rep. Millie Hamner, or our Latina Speaker of the House Crisanta Duran.

Why is it important for legislators to connect over state lines about issues that they care about?

Rep. Herod: We have a lot to learn from each other. There is no reason to recreate the wheel every time on every issue. We can support each other, offer lessons learned and help elevate each other’s messages on social media. The wealth of knowledge that we share is powerful and can certainly translate across state lines. Also, on many issues, states don't want to be the first out of the gate. It's helpful to know others are doing the same thing or contemplating it.

What has the outcome been in Colorado since funding this program?

Rep. Herod: The program has been a huge success! I have since visited women in Colorado’s Women’s Correctional Facility and they cite the change as one of the biggest examples of positive change during their time in Corrections. They felt like they had been listened to and were afforded a bit more dignity. The warden even thanked me because he says that it has led to more positive interactions with the inmates. Most importantly, there have been ZERO negative reported incidences as a result of this change.

What else would you like readers from other states to know?

Rep. Herod: I really saw this as a humanity issue. I simply couldn't imagine how women were either going without proper hygiene products or having to make the case to a guard (often male) for those products. It seemed so obvious to me. And, ultimately, it costs the Department of Corrections $40,000 a year, which is a mere pittance of its close to $1 billion budget. It was time for change and I was happy to lead the charge.

Follow Reps. Salman and Herod on Facebook and twitter for more updates on their work.

Facebook: @LeslieforColorado @SalmanforAZ

Twitter: @leslieherod @AthenaSalman

A New Day for Reproductive Health in New Jersey

By New Jersey Sen. Loretta Weinberg

 The resistance is alive in the Garden State. Just a few weeks into 2018, we in New Jersey are already reversing eight years of setbacks to reproductive rights and health that former Gov. Chris Christie so outrageously spearheaded. New Jersey was one of two states, along with Washington, that saw a return to full Democratic governance last November, and we’re working hard to deliver results for voters.

Eight years ago, New Jersey’s reproductive health safety net was decimated as then-Governor Christie eliminated the $7.45 million family planning budget. That decision  forced six health care clinics to close their doors, and since then, the number of cases of bacterial sexually transmitted diseases increased 35 percent statewide. In half of New Jersey counties the STI rate increased by nearly 50 percent or higher. Breast and cervical cancer cases increased 5.2 percent, disproportionately impacting women of color.

None of this mattered to Chris Christie for eight years. But it mattered to me. And it mattered to the 455,000 women in need of publicly supported contraception in our state.

My colleagues and I fought every year to reinstate these necessary funds – a tiny portion (a fraction of a percent) of our state’s overall budget – only to see Governor Christie’s veto pen eliminate the money we added for critical health care services that so many New Jerseyans relied on. It is infuriating to know how much his actions harmed women and families across the state.

A lot has changed, especially in the past year. We now see millions of women marching in the streets, from D.C. to Des Moines, not just once and not just as a one-off. We have a record number of women running for office nationwide, scores of women contacting their members of Congress, and of course, a new administration in Trenton committed to women’s health and public health.

This energy and excitement will, and must, help put an end to the years-long avalanche of attacks on reproductive rights from conservative state legislators around the country. The slashing of reproductive health access in New Jersey did not happen in a vacuum. Nationwide, more than 400 restrictions on reproductive rights have been enacted in states since 2011, after a wave of conservative lawmakers took office.

State legislators in every region have passed new laws that try to take us backward by decimating family planning and sex education resources, denying and delaying critical health care, and making it ever more difficult for women to have healthy pregnancies and raise families safely and with dignity. Low-income people and people of color bear the brunt of these devastating policies. We have seen it firsthand in New Jersey, but we certainly aren’t alone.

It is equally outrageous that this happens in other states, like Mississippi, where only one abortion provider is left to serve the whole state, or Utah, where lawmakers force patients to wait at least 72 hours and make two trips to clinics before receiving care. States have served as anti-woman testing grounds for years, and now Congress is seizing the opportunity to enact their own versions of these draconian laws or use them as a political football.

Meanwhile, these efforts have trickled upward into the Trump administration. Trump has planted anti-women’s health extremists throughout its agencies. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is led by veterans of the anti-abortion, anti-birth control movement. And shockingly, even the Office of Refugee Resettlement has interfered with a sexual assault survivor’s ability to access the abortion care she needed, simply because she is undocumented.

Anyone who cares about women and women’s health has work to do, locally and nationally. The good news is: It’s a new day in New Jersey. Together, we can reverse the damage of the last eight years and move forward with a commitment to women’s health and rights. Each day I serve in the New Jersey legislature is a chance for me to help build a better future for our state. This year, instead of encountering roadblocks to our efforts support women’s rights, reproductive rights and women’s health, New Jersey will instead advance meaningful solutions to the health care needs, economic inequalities, and other challenges our constituents face, and see these initiatives signed into law. It’s what women in New Jersey – and everywhere – deserve.

Loretta Weinberg is the State Senate Majority Leader in New Jersey, where she represents Bergen County. Sen. Weinberg has served in the New Jersey legislature since 1992.

Connecting the Dots: How Contraception and Abortion Insurance Coverage Ensures Economic Security for Families

By Agata Pelka

The ability to plan, time, and space children is inextricably linked with economic opportunity, stability, and security for women and families. This is no surprise to the majority of women who report using contraception as a means to complete their education, keep or get a job, and to support themselves and their families financially. In addition, voters intuitively recognize the connection between control over one’s reproductive decision-making, financial stability, and equal access to opportunities.

Access to contraception is widely documented as an important factor in increasing female engagement in the work force and for narrowing the gender wage gap. Today, working mothers are the breadwinners in four out of 10 American families, and working women’s income is integral to the economic security of most families. The impact of one's ability to decide whether and when to have a child on women’s economic outcomes is even more stark when examining long-term outcomes for women who were denied a wanted abortion: they were almost three times more likely to be unemployed and almost four times more likely to be below the Federal Poverty Level than women who were able to successfully access the abortion care they wanted.

It is important to note that the economic benefits of contraceptive use have not been distributed equally: low-income women and women of color have not benefited as much as their higher-income and white counterparts. We still have a lot of work to do to ensure that all women have meaningful access to comprehensive reproductive health care. One of the major barriers to consistent contraceptive use is high out-of-pocket cost, and women in particular are likely to defer medical care because of cost. Even with insurance, cost-sharing in the form of co-pays can be prohibitive to accessing the most effective – and in turn often the most expensive – contraceptive methods. Cost-sharing for health services is specifically intended to discourage the use of non-essential services, which is inappropriate when applied to ongoing contraceptive use.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) acknowledged this fact and removed this obstacle by extending a no co-pay requirement to contraceptive coverage. As a result, women saved approximately $483 million on contraception in 2013. State legislators have also increasingly taken steps to protect and expand coverage for contraceptives and abortion care in their states.  Six states currently prohibit cost-sharing for contraception and three have provisions that will be effective in 2018 and 2019 – most of which cover even more methods than under the ACA. California and New York require certain plans to cover abortion care. Last session, Oregon passed ground-breaking legislation requiring health insurers to cover the full spectrum of reproductive health services – including contraception, abortion, prenatal and postpartum care – without co-pay. Since state legislative sessions kicked off in January, legislators have continued the momentum to improve coverage for reproductive health care by introducing bills in several states:

All of these measures would make contraception and abortion care more accessible to women. Ensuring that everyone has access to comprehensive reproductive health care coverage – which includes contraception, abortion, prenatal and postnatal care – allows a woman to make the best decisions for her circumstances and her family. As threats to these vital services continue to loom at the federal level, more and more state legislators have been turning their attention to this issue as part of their family economic security agendas. Reproductive health advocates and their constituents around the country eagerly await more bill introductions pushing these protections forward this session and beyond.

Agata Pelka is a State Legislative Counsel at the Center for Reproductive Rights, where she works to advance proactive policy strategies in the states.

Fighting for Families Means Improving Access to Long Term Care

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Michigan Rep. Jon Hoadley (D-Kalamazoo), wrote a guest blog on the importance of supporting our country’s aging population by improving access to long-term care for seniors and ensuring caregivers are paid fair wages.


 

By Michigan Rep. Jon Hoadley

By 2030, Michigan’s senior population will double, meaning that in just over ten years, one in five Michiganders will be over the age of 65. Those shifting demographics are not unique to Michigan, of course; in every state, the number of Baby Boomers reaching retirement age is in-creasing the percentage of older adults and increasing the potential long-term care needs of our country. If we want a state where families and communities truly thrive, the coming decade presents an opportunity organizers, advocates, and elected officials to build the kind of care infra-structure that works for seniors, people with disabilities, paid care workers and family caregivers, and Michigan is at the forefront of building the systems we need. During the State Innovation Exchange’s Fighting for Families Week of Action, it’s crucial to recognize that fighting for families means supporting our country’s aging population, and family member’s ability to secure paid leave to care for ailing parents and grandparents.

To make the strongest case for the policy changes that will ensure that all seniors have access to affordable long-term care, it was clear to me that we first needed to gather comprehensive data about the current state of care in Michigan, and that we needed to model the proposed benefits programs against that data to create something robust and economically sustainable. This legislative session, the study bill I introduced as a member of the Michigan House has won support from both sides of the aisle, and if it passes will present our legislature with long-over-due analysis of the state of aging in Michigan and offer possible paths forward.

Perhaps most important to me is creating a system in the coming years that allows seniors to remain in their homes as they age, rather than moving to care facilities or nursing homes. There is certainly a need for those facilities, of course, but far too often, seniors wind up in those set-tings as a result of a failure in the care system. Medicare, the program that helps older adults meet their health care needs, generally does not pay for home and community based long-term care —but it does pay for care in a facility. Too many families are forced to choose between remaining at home and paying out-of-pocket for home care, or moving to a care facility, where Medicare pays the bill but where seniors are often not nearly as comfortable as they were in their own homes. A key component of the new system we must create is ensuring that caregivers are paid a fair wage. The work of caregiving must be treated with dignity and respect, which means ensuring that paid caregivers earn enough to provide for their own families as they take care of others.

Other states are beginning to take on these care challenges, too. In Hawaii, the Kupuna Care-givers program took effect last year, which helps provide a care benefit so that family caregivers can remain in the workforce and ensure their parents receive the home care services they need. And the Washington legislature just held hearings on a proposal to create a long-term care in-surance program, to create a sustainable and universal guarantee of access to long-term care as Washingtonians age.

Instead of waiting for federal solutions, Michigan is helping imagine new ways to meet the needs of our changing population. As our work continues, I hope to be able to work with legislators across the country to apply what we’re learning in more and more statehouses over the coming decade.

Michigan Rep. Jon Hoadley (D-Kalamazoo) is currently in his second term representing Michi-gan’s 60th House District.

Unions are Fighting for Families by Supporting Women and Rejecting the Status Quo

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Liz Shuler, the Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO wrote a guest blog about the importance of women in the labor movement, and how labor unions are helping advance policies at the state level that support working families.


 

By Liz Shuler

Women in the workplace have made major strides. Women currently make up 48% of the workforce and are the sole or primary breadwinner for 40% of families in the United States. Yet most family responsibilities still rest on women’s shoulders and, too often, women put in a full day’s work only to come home and clock in for a second shift.

As Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO, I am constantly in awe of the powerful work the 6.8 million women of the labor movement do to advance issues that matter. Consider this: In the past decade, there has been tremendous momentum at the state and local level, with millions of working people winning the freedom to take time off to care for family, and labor unions have been at the center of these wins. Which might explain why states with higher union density are more likely to have paid sick leave and paid family and medical leave laws. And, when unions are strong, women are strong. Unions make a difference for women in dollars and cents—$222, to be exact. That’s how much more the typical woman in a union job makes in a week compared with a woman in a non-union job.

Beyond supporting working women, the labor movement has always advocated for policies that promote a full-employment economy at wages high enough to allow working people to support their families. We work to combat policies that erode the rights of working people, and make sure they're rewarded for the wealth they help create. To achieve this, we support a broad range of policies, including restoring the minimum wage to a living wage, restoring overtime protections, prevailing wage standards, and putting an end to wage theft and the rampant misclassification of employees as independent contractors. The AFL-CIO adopted this working people’s Bill of Rights at our recent convention to demand that all working people have the right to:

Building on recent victories, state legislators have demonstrated that they are #FightingForFamilies in 2018 by introducing legislation to advance some of these policies in states across the country, and union members have been advocating alongside them. Sixteen states have bills pending for paid family and medical leave in 2018. Thirteen states are considering bills for equal pay, and 13 states are considering paid sick days. Sixteen states are considering measures to prevent employment discrimination against LGBT workers. Ten states have bills to ensure pregnant workers' rights. And that's just the beginning.

Young workers, immigrants, women, LGBT people and communities of color are coming together to advance changes that will improve our lives. When we join in union, we are a formidable force, a political force. Together, we can make equal pay, paid leave, and fair scheduling the law of the land. Together, we can lead a movement to change the world and build an economy that works for us all. Together, we can reject quiet acceptance and build an America where all working women can sustain their families and realize their dreams.

Women fight and win battles every day. By standing and negotiating together, we will continue to make the world a better place for all of us. Unions are rejecting the status quo and are working to build an America where all working people can sustain their families and realize their dreams.

Liz Shuler is the Secretary-Treasurer of the AFL-CIO.

Sexual Harassment Won’t Stop If We Aren’t #FightingForFamilies

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Andrea Johnson, the Senior Counsel for State Policy at the National Women’s Law Center, wrote a guest blog about how legislators can fight for systemic, structural changes in our workplaces to alleviate the gender power imbalances that have allowed sexual harassment to persist. 


 

By Andrea Johnson 

From the moment it was announced that the National Women’s Law Center would be housing and administering the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund, we saw a dramatic spike in the number of women calling our intake line about sexual harassment. But we also saw a spike in equal pay intakes. We weren’t surprised; when a woman complains of sexual harassment at work, it is not uncommon to find out that she is also being discriminated against in her pay. 

That is because sexual harassment isn’t about sex and pay discrimination isn’t about pay. They are both about power. They are about sexist and racist power structures in our workplaces that value women—and especially women of color—less.  

Sexist stereotypes and outdated workplace structures—like the lack of paid leave, predictable work schedules, affordable child care, and union support—make it hard for women to get and keep good jobs and advance in the workplace. This leaves women with less power in the workplace, increasing their vulnerability to exploitation. Sexual harassment and pay discrimination are stark manifestations of that power imbalance.  

Actors, like Debra Messing and Eva Longoria, who have been supporting Time’s Up on the red carpet, have been quick to make sure that the response to the #MeToo moment doesn’t just focus on sexual harassment, but also addresses other workplace inequalities, like gender pay disparities. They understand that sexual harassment and the gender wage gap exist in a vicious cycle that further entrenches these power imbalances.  

Women’s lower on average wages leave them more vulnerable to harassment, as they struggle to get the raise they deserve or put food on the table. A striking example: tipped workers – two-thirds of whom are women – are paid not much over $2.13/hour in many states and are expected to make up the rest of their income with tips. Women who rely on tips to survive often feel forced to tolerate inappropriate behavior from customers so as not to jeopardize their income—and employers can be slow or unwilling to protect their employees for fear of upsetting a paying customer. Women’s lack of economic power in these workplaces perpetuates the already pervasive culture of sexual harassment in the restaurant industry and others that employ large numbers of tipped workers. 

Sexual harassment, in turn, widens the wage gap by negatively impacting women’s wages and lifetime earnings. Sexual harassment can hurt employee health, productivity, and morale, and push women out of their jobs or lead them to leave an industry or profession altogether. Reporting harassment can damage career prospects and advancement. And for male-dominated jobs, like construction or STEM, the pervasiveness of sexual harassment keeps women from entering and staying in these jobs and earning the higher wages they offer, pushing them instead into lower-paying female-dominated jobs. All of this decreases women’s earnings relative to men’s.  

As harassers and the employers that failed to hold them accountable are being called out, we also need to be calling out the workplace policies and structures that have allowed sexual harassment to persist for far too long.  

This week, state legislators across the country are speaking out against the Trump Administration’s erosion of protections for working families. They are advancing a different vision—a #FightingForFamilies agenda that “promotes opportunity and fairness and creates economic security for American families by raising incomes and creating good jobs.” This agenda focuses on raising the minimum wage, the freedom to stand together in unions, paid leave, protections against pay discrimination and pregnancy discrimination, and affordable child care and health care, to name a few. Strengthening protections against sexual harassment is also, appropriately, a part of this agenda because sexual harassment threatens women’s equality in the workplace, it threatens women’s ability to get and keep a good job, to succeed at work, and to care and provide for their families. And strengthening our sexual harassment protections is long overdue. 

State legislators have responded to this #MeToo moment with great energy and urgency, introducing dozens of bills to address and prevent sexual harassment within our workplaces, including their own legislatures. We applaud the policymakers seeking to harness the energy of the #MeToo movement into real solutions, but we must not forget how important workplace protections beyond our sexual harassment laws are to preventing sexual harassment. Legislators’ #MeToo efforts will be little more than window dressing if we aren’t fighting for systemic, structural changes in our workplaces to alleviate the gender power imbalances that have allowed sexual harassment to persist. 

In the name of #MeToo, we need to be fighting for equal pay and to raise the minimum wage and eliminate the lower tipped minimum wage. We need to be fighting for supports for caregivers (the majority of whom are still women) like paid leave, pregnancy accommodations, and affordable child care. We need to be fighting not just to strengthen our protections against sexual harassment, but all forms of harassment and discrimination, as they are connected and together reinforce gender, racial, and other forms of inequality in our society that leave women vulnerable to harassment.  

In short, #MeToo will be in vain, if we aren’t #FightingForFamilies. 

Andrea Johnson is the Senior Counsel for State Policy at the National Women’s Law Center 

Real Info. Smart Policy. Shared Prosperity: Fighting for Families Through Fiscal Policy Analysis

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Erica Williams, the Director of State Policy Initiatives with the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, wrote a guest blog emphasizing how state governments can move away from tax cuts for the wealthy, and raise and spend tax revenue in ways that profoundly affect families and communities. 


 

By Erica Williams

Choices states make about investing in schools, health care, child care, and other services can either help create opportunity and prosperity for people or hold them back. State policymakers can build broad prosperity and thriving communities by #FightingForFamilies with essential public investments that help us tap every individual’s potential.

Unfortunately, the new federal tax overhaul is a reminder of how much work we have to do to realize our vision of a just and equitable economy. Our states’ tax systems tilt too heavily to the wealthy and powerful, hurt working people and those struggling to get by, and reflect and reinforce barriers to economic opportunity that result from this country’s long history of racial oppression. All too often, we ask the most from those with the least, fail to make the types of public investments that dismantle barriers to opportunity, and make important fiscal policy decisions without transparency or input from those most affected — namely low-income communities and communities of color.

It’s time to ensure that lawmakers have access to real information and real solutions for America’s working families. Our four-point fiscal policy blueprint maps out how state lawmakers can build thriving state economies: Invest in good schools in every community, family economic supports, health coverage, and high-quality infrastructure, and help ensure long-term tax fairness by cleaning up the tax code.

To build thriving communities and economies, state lawmakers can:

This agenda is ambitious. That’s why the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) is excited to work with stakeholders across the country who put families first as they advance policies that promote economic opportunity and stability. The 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action is a demonstration of our shared values and belief that the most important thing states can do is to drive broadly shared prosperity.

In 2018, CBPP, along with more than 40 state-based budget and tax policy organizations we support, is dedicated to providing unassailable research and insightful analysis that can change the discussion in state legislatures on key issues ranging from tax cuts for the wealthy to how we invest in the building blocks that help working families thrive.

Everyone in America — regardless of where they were born, the state where they live, the color of their skin, or the size of their bank account — should have the opportunity to achieve their goals. But ensuring broad opportunity and prosperity won’t happen by chance, which is why we are committed to fight for families and communities with smart state fiscal policies that build a better future for all state residents.

Erica Williams is Director of State Policy Initiatives with the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities State Fiscal Policy division. Erica oversees several of the division’s policy initiatives including on state earned income tax credits, poverty reduction, juvenile justice, immigration, and racial, gender, and economic equity.  

States Won't Wait for Equal Pay

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Kim Churchesthe Chief Executive Officer of the American Association of University Women wrote a guest blog about the importance of fighting for equal pay for all women coast-to-coast.


By Kim Churches  

Women and families are hurt by the gender pay gap. Taking home 13 percent, 20 percent, 37 percent, 41 percent, 43 percent, or 46 percent less than a colleague because of the compounded effect of race on the gender pay gap is unacceptable. The pay gap also presents an especially difficult challenge to mothers: At a time when more women than ever are breadwinners or co-breadwinners in their households, the motherhood penalty presents a significant challenge to mothers’ ability to provide for their families. And with women holding nearly two-thirds of the country’s $1.3 trillion of student debt they can’t afford to be hindered by the pay gap when paying off their often crushing debt.   

But there’s hope on the horizon. During the Fighting for Families Week of Action, it’s as clear as ever that fighting for equal pay stands to benefit all working families, and state legislators are taking on that fight in response to the women and families who are raising their voices about the need for equal pay. In 2015 and 2016 dozens of legislatures proposed and enacted bills and laws addressing pay inequality, and in 2017 a whopping 42 states, as well as Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., offered legislative solutions to the gender pay gap. Though not all of these bills passed, this growing activity indicates that red, blue, and purple states realize that the pay gap is real and that they need to take action to close it now.  

Now, in the early days of 2018 state legislative sessions, 32 states have already introduced bills to combat the gender pay gap. These bills are sponsored by a diverse set of members on both sides of the aisle. While it’s disappointing that Congress continually fails to take action at the federal level, states are taking up the mantle and forging new paths toward equity.   

Women everywhere are refusing to accept unequal pay. That’s why the American Association of University Women (AAUW)  is working to close the pay gap using multi-pronged solutions that include in-depth research, salary negotiation workshops, and advocacy for strong equal pay laws at the federal, state, and local levels. Such seminal research as AAUW’s The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap and Graduating to a Pay Gap give advocates the facts they need to explain this pervasive problem and its impact. AAUW Work Smart salary negotiation workshops, which have trained more than 30,000 women, help individuals secure the salary and benefits they deserve. With partnerships in five cities across the nation to date (as well as the recent addition of Massachusetts!) and rapid scaling of the program under way, AAUW aims to train millions more women nationwide by 2020.  Additionally,  AAUW’s devoted advocates are proud to partner with elected representatives who are committed to making unequal pay a thing of the past through the passage and implementation of strong legislative solutions.

AAUW advocates and legislative trailblazers in states including California, Massachusetts, and Oregon should be extremely proud of what they’ve accomplished over the last few years as they work to close the gender pay gap. But I want to laud the hard work that is taking place across the country to close the gender pay gap not just on the coasts but also in America’s heartland. The drive toward equal pay is a nationwide phenomenon occurring at both state and city levels.

In recent years such states as Illinois, Nevada, Nebraska, and Utah and cities like Pittsburgh and New Orleans all enacted provisions designed to bring greater equity to our workplaces. Recognizing equal pay is not a partisan issue but a practical one, activists and legislators alike also laid the groundwork to bring change to such red, blue and purple states as Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma, and Virginia in 2018 and beyond.   

Women and advocates for equity are ready not only to continue the success we had around equal pay in years prior but also to expand that success from coast to coast, and north to south. Get ready for equal pay in every state through the right policies and programs for systemic change.  

Kim Churches is the Chief Executive Officer of the American Association of University Women.   

Fighting for Families Means Fighting for Infrastructure Investment to Create Jobs and Boost Quality of Life

As part of SiX’s 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Tate Hausman, the Executive Director of the Millions of Jobs Coalition, wrote a guest blog on the importance of public infrastructure investment that doesn’t rely on private investment or place an undue burden on state and local governments.  


 

By Tate Hausman 

It’s no secret – America’s infrastructure is failing. The crumbling state of our infrastructure earned it a grade of D+ from the American Society of Civil Engineers in their 2017 report.  

In an era of unprecedented political partisanship, investing in infrastructure is seemingly one of few things that all Americans still agree on. Ask any of the ninety percent of Americans who drive to work every day. Ask any child who takes the bus to school in the mornings. Ask the residents of Flint, Michigan. 

They will all tell you the same thing – that America’s infrastructure is in dire need of an upgrade. For decades, roads, bridges, and other critical infrastructure have sat in disrepair in cities towns across the entire country. During the State Innovation Exchange’s Fighting for Families Week of Action and beyond, progressive legislators in states like Colorado and Michigan are acting on that need by emphasizing the importance of investing in infrastructure updates to create good jobs and improve American’s quality of life.  

But in last week’s State of the Union address, as President Trump embarks on his second year in office, we learned more about the White House’s master plan to upgrade America’s infrastructure. As is so often the case with President Trump, there was much to fact check.   

Throughout his campaign, President Trump campaigned on a “$1 trillion infrastructure plan,” but leaked details show the proposal only contains $200 billion in dedicated federal funding. The rest of the invented money is supposed to come from private investment (so-called P3s). State and local governments are already responsible for over 80% of all infrastructure investment, but instead of bridging the state and local funding gap, Trump’s infrastructure plan relies heavily on private investment (i.e., leveraging private equity capital). That means more tolls in our cities and little or no improvements at all for rural America. After all, there is simply no incentive for Wall Street investors to fix a broken bridge in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 

The kicker? That $200 billion wouldn’t actually include any new federal spending. Instead, that pot of money would come from massive cuts to Amtrak, TIGER and other existing infrastructure programs, resulting in the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.  

President Trump’s “toll bill” would effectively rob public funding from Peter to pay investment banker Paul. 

President Trump’s infrastructure proposal would also severely roll back public input and critical environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This and other bedrock environmental laws like the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts protect public health and are essential tools ensuring government accountability. Without these protections, pipelines through National Parks and toxic waste incinerators in local neighborhoods – exempted from complying with basic environmental laws – are all very real possibilities. Fortunately, Americans don’t buy the claim that safe roads have to come at the cost of clean water.  

We know better: with the right leadership and the proper foresight, our nation’s infrastructure problems are very solvable. The basis of that plan must be major, direct federal investment. Large parts of rural America simply don’t have the money or the traffic to attract private-sector investment. 

What Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower knew to be true in the 1950s is still true today. It’s no accident that federal highway system – one of the most successful programs in the history of our country – was a product of direct public investment in infrastructure.  

By embracing a just, equitable, and sustainable vision for the American economy that prioritizes public investment instead of corporate giveaways, an infrastructure package that creates new jobs is achievable. That requires the following: 

1. Invest in creating millions of new jobs. 

2. Prioritize public investment over corporate giveaways and selling off public goods. 

3. Ensure that direct public investment provides the overwhelming majority of the funds for infrastructure improvement. 

4. Prioritize racial and gender equity, environmental justice, and worker protections. 

5. Embrace 21st-century clean energy jobs. 

6. Protect wages, expand Buy American provisions, encourage project labor agreements, and prioritize the needs of disadvantaged communities — both urban and rural. 

7. Ensure the wealthiest Americans and giant corporations who reap the greatest economic benefit from public goods pay their fair share for key investments. 

8. Ensure infrastructure investment does not come at the expense of Social Security and other vital programs. 

9. Protect and strengthen existing rules and laws protecting our environment, worker safety, wages, or equitable hiring practices. 

10. Prioritize resilient infrastructure that can withstand natural disasters and cyber or physical attacks. 

Everybody wants strong infrastructure – Democrats and Republicans alike – but Trump’s infrastructure plan comes at far too high a cost. It would line the pockets of Trump supporters on Wall Street, while leaving the rest of us to pay Trump Tolls on our ever-worsening highways, bridges and transit systems. After $1.5 trillion in corporate tax cuts, simply can't afford another giveaway to the ultra-rich. 

Tate Hausman is the Executive Director of the Millions of Jobs coalition, a diverse coalition of labor unions, advocacy groups, elected officials, and grassroots activists working for a real, long-term, 21st-century jobs and infrastructure package that benefits all Americans. 

Fighting for Families Through an Allegiance to Public Schools in Tennessee and Nationwide

As part of SiX's 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Lyn HoytState Alliance Coordinator for the Tennessee Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools, wrote a guest blog on the importance of investing and supporting K-12 public schools and advancing local efforts supporting community schools in Tennessee and nationwide.  


 

By Lyn Hoyt 

Public schools are the vehicle through which we guarantee all children a free education from kindergarten through 12th grade.  In our collective interest, we promise that poor children and rich children, students with disabilities, students of color, immigrant and non-immigrant, will have access to an equitable, quality public education, paid for by taxpayers and controlled by local communities.  Public schools ensure that our students have the skills they will need for good jobs and productive futures. They also teach young people how to participate in our democracy. 

Yet across the country, we continue to invest more in schools serving white children than in schools serving African American and Latino children. And as the number of students living in poverty has risen in the U.S., state and local funding for public education has decreased in the past decade.  Public schools are one more American institution caught up in the rising inequality that faces our nation. 

The Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools (AROS), a national labor and community collaboration, believes that public schools play a critical role, not just in strengthening our economy, but also in supporting the success of local communities. As we participate in the State Innovation Exchange’s “Fighting for Families” week of action, we know this:  We have to get education right. 

As the State Alliance Coordinator for AROS in Tennessee, we are building a statewide AROS coalition that includes organized parents, educators, students and community members. Tennessee AROS includes the Tennessee Parent Teacher Association, the Tennessee Education Association (TEA) and other local community-based groups.  We came together a year ago to advocate for a new approach to the complex challenge of improving our public schools. Our mission is to support the creation of public schools where families, communities, students and educators take ownership of their schools to insure the success of every child. 

This year, we are working with a unique bipartisan group of state legislators to promote “transformational” community schools across Tennessee to create a locally led, district level approach to school improvement. The most effective community schools combine six components: a rich, culturally relevant curriculum; an emphasis on high-quality teaching, not high stakes testing; wrap-around supports for students and their families; positive discipline practices such as restorative justice; authentic parent and community engagement and inclusive school leadership.  Studies by the Center for Popular Democracy, and the Learning Policy Institute, along with the National Education Policy Center suggest that these components, working together, can have dramatic effects, not just on student academic outcomes, but on school culture and climate, teacher retention, chronic absenteeism and more.  

Our community schools bill HB2472 and SB2393, filed by sponsors Senator Steve Dickerson (R) and Representative Harold Love (D), creates a fund where the state may allocate resources from various sources to support staffing community schools site coordinators through a Local Education Agency and district-led application process. Any school in the state whose performance has placed them on the priority or focus list would have the opportunity to apply. The commitment to a needs assessment and site coordinator are the major part of the fund application plan. AROS will advocate for a deeper engagement with educators and families to be a part of school-level implementation. It is an exciting time to be organizing parents and teachers to become a critical part of creating the schools our children deserve as we fight for families. 

Our approach has been one of bi-partisanship. The community partnership piece is something that appeals to conservatives. And the community voice in the process is one that appeals to progressives. All agree that we must do more to make sure children can be successful in school. Everyone also agrees we must approach this sustainably with multiple funding sources, not just state or federal grants. So, long term commitment from the community and school districts are critical. 

The long-range strategy is to develop a culture of shared decision-making that includes educators and families, ultimately strengthening participation in democracy, supporting great teaching and stabilizing communities as well as improving student academic outcomes. In public education, that’s how we make sure that our democracy is working for all of us. AROS is proud that Tennessee is working collaboratively to strengthen community schools across the state. We are modeling the democratic process and organizing the community around those agreed-upon goals and identifying the community resources to achieve those goals to help make our schools great.

Lyn Hoyt is a Nashville resident, public school parent and the State Alliance Coordinator for TennAROS.org 

Fighting for Families Means Fighting for National Paid Family and Medical Leave

As part of SiX's 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, Vicki Shabo, the vice president for workplace policies and strategies at the National Partnership for Women & Families, wrote a guest blog commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and explaining the importance of fighting for a real national paid family and medical leave plan that doesn’t leave anyone behind. 


 

By Vicki Shabo 

The signing of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) 25 years ago this week was a landmark moment for women, families and America’s workplace culture. Since 1993, people have taken unpaid leave under the FMLA more than 200 million times to welcome a new child, care for a sick loved one or recover from a serious medical issue without having to risk their jobs. Today, we are in the midst of another watershed moment for the country as national attention to the need for fairer, more equitable workplaces reaches historic levels. But if this national reckoning is going to bring about real and lasting change, it needs to result in policies that value women and care – and few things would bring more meaningful change than a national paid family and medical leave program.  

State and local lawmakers, like private sector employers, have a critical role to play in the fight for paid leave. After all, they see firsthand the challenges working families, businesses and the economy face when people have to choose between their jobs and their health or the health of their families. New state-based data released by the National Partnership for the FMLA’s anniversary demonstrate the scope of these conflicts between work and family by state – and just how much worse it could get.  

Take, for example, New Hampshire. In less than 15 years, the share of the state’s population age 65 and older will grow by nearly 45 percent. In Colorado, more than one in five workers are age 55 and older. In more than 70 percent of all Virginia households with children – more than 1.2 million homes – all parents have paying jobs. When people, and especially women, cannot take the time they need to provide and receive care, they end up leaving the workforce, forfeiting income and their retirement security. In fact, in Nevada, there is a 15-percentage point gap in labor force participation between men and women. 

Considering that women, particularly women of color, are often key breadwinners for their families, in addition to being primary caregivers, paid leave means more than taking time to bond with a new child or care for aging parent – it means economic stability and a greater ability to survive life’s inevitable changes and unforeseen challenges. It is also inextricably linked to women’s health, especially in their reproductive years, at this time when access to comprehensive reproductive health care is being pushed further and further out of reach. Paid leave means women have the time and resources to choose when, and if, they want to start a family.  

Already, legislators in five states – California, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and Washington – and the District of Columbia have enacted paid family and medical leave programs. New York’s program took effect on Jan. 1 and the programs in Washington state and D.C. will take effect in coming years. But the three longest-standing programs are having widespread benefits for working people and families, businesses and the states’ economies. These states are leading the way on paid leave and demonstrating what works.  

Lawmakers in other states, across political and ideological spectrums, are considering paid leave proposals too. State-level proposals were introduced in 31 states in 2017 and are under active consideration in a number of states already in 2018, including in deep red states like Georgia and Mississippi, as well as in places like New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Colorado and Maine. This is a clear sign of growing consensus around the need for a paid leave policy that helps people better meet the dual demands of work and family while strengthening businesses and boosting the economy.  

State lawmakers and the organizations that serve them, like the State Innovation Exchange, are playing a pivotal role in securing the progress that will ultimately lead to the national paid family and medical leave plan we need: the Family And Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act. The FAMILY Act would create a national paid leave insurance program similar to those working so well in several states. The bill currently has the support of more than 170 members of Congress. 

At this critical time for the country, 25 years after the FMLA, the paid leave momentum must continue. So, during this #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, share what #PaidLeaveMeans to you as part of the #FMLA25 celebration and call to action. Because fighting for families means fighting for a real national paid family and medical leave plan that doesn’t leave anyone behind. It is long past time to fulfill the FMLA’s promise of truly family friendly workplaces with paid family and medical leave for all working people.  

Vicki Shabo is vice president for workplace policies and strategies at the National Partnership for Women & Families.  

 

SiX Thanks North Carolina State Legislators for Standing Up for Working Families

The State Innovation Exchange (SiX) thanks North Carolina Representatives Deb Butler, Joe John, Mary Belk, Cynthia Ball, and Chaz Beasley and Senators Jay Chaudhuri and Jeff Jackson for standing up for working families in North Carolina by fighting for affordable childcare and early education, equal pay for equal work, and access to job and vocational training.

To find out more information about how they are creating an economy that works for all, please contact SiX at info@stateinnovation.org.

Farewell Note from Executive Director Nick Rathod

As we gear up for a new year and our state legislative work gets underway, I wanted to give you some exciting news about our work as well as changes at SiX.

Four years ago, I was hired to build an organization to support progressive state legislators across the country. This critical infrastructure has eluded the progressive movement for generations, while conservatives have benefited enormously in investing locally, which has allowed them control of policy making, bench building, elections and redistricting across the states now for more than a decade.

Working with our amazing staff, board, funders, and partners over these last years we have been able to change this dynamic and impact progressive’s work in the states in countless ways. Our programs are helping legislators to be more effective at serving their constituencies, translating into stronger communication of progressive values and tangible policy results for millions of Americans. The spaces we provide for networking, like our annual conference, have allowed for a cross-pollination of ideas and the creation of a community of legislators across the country. And the strategic support we provide has armed legislators with the tools and information they need to defeat regressive policies and advance ones that are aimed at treating all Americans fairly and providing working families with security and opportunity.

The organization has also grown. This will be the first year that we will have full time staff on the ground in state capitals.   We have also added to our already dynamic national team.  Last year, we brought on Neha Patel as Chief Development and Strategy Officer and Leigh Warren as our first Chief Operating Officer. Both bring decades of experience in their fields and have had enormous impact in the organization. Vicki Simarano, a nationally known legislative strategist and campaign organizer, joined us to run our legislative operations, and veteran advocate Kelly Baden joined as our Director of Reproductive Rights. And last month, Ellen Moran joined SiX as a senior advisor to help us develop a strategic plan. Ellen brings over 20 years of experience running progressive campaigns and causes, and previously served as Executive Director of EMILY’s List.

Together, we have built a special organization that is poised for even greater impact in the coming years.

As proud as I am of this amazing progress, I have also been taking the time over the last several months to think about my own future. In the beginning of the new year, I informed the chair of our Board of Directors that I would be leaving as Executive Director of SiX. I am excited about opportunities to pursue consulting and take on a more diverse set of projects that will allow me to continue to contribute to the broader progressive movement.  I’m also taking to heart the importance of engaging locally and will be fully exploring the best ways for me to serve my community and the Commonwealth of Virginia. And, I am especially looking forward to being present for my wife and three young children who have missed me as I traveled many, many days and nights these past years.

While this is bittersweet for me, I’m excited to see SiX’s work continue and grow. The SiX staff and Board of Directors are some of the most dedicated and passionate professionals I have ever worked with and they are committed to taking the organization to the next level.

As I transition out in the coming weeks, Ellen Moran will take on my responsibilities on an interim basis as a search for a new Executive Director begins. She will be working with our talented staff to run and manage this transition until a new Executive Director comes on board. As the 2018 state legislative sessions get underway, I couldn’t be more optimistic about our prospects to drive change in the states. Your continued support and partnership will be crucial as SiX moves forward.

I don’t have the words to fully express how grateful I am both personally and institutionally for your friendship and support. My sincerest thanks for all you have done – and will continue to do – for SiX.

Onward,

-Nick

Join SiX for Our 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action: Feb. 5-9, 2018

Between February 5 and 9, 2018, the State Innovation Exchange (SiX) is proud to host our 2nd annual #FightingForFamilies Week of Action. We host this special week each year to shine a light on policy solutions progressive legislators are advancing at the state level to build an economy that works for all of us, not just the wealthy few, where our families and communities can thrive.

This year’s #FightingForFamilies Week of Action will arrive as President Trump is embarking on his second year in office. In 2017, Trump and conservatives embraced an erosion of decency and democratic norms, launched an aggressive effort to strip health care from millions of Americans, and showered the wealthy and big corporations with tax cuts that will line the pockets of the wealthiest 1% on the backs of working families.

In 2017, voters made their voices heard in local and special elections across the country. The largest protests in modern history and huge growth in grassroots activism showed that the American people want real solutions.

In 2018, progressive state legislators and advocates across the country will build on that momentum. During the #FightingForFamilies Week of Action, we will highlight how legislator’s efforts are impacting working families, and will be organizing grassroots activities to engage thousands of constituents.

So what does it mean, exactly, to be #FightingForFamilies?

The 2018 #FightingForFamilies Week of Action will also coincide with the 25th anniversary of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) on Monday, February 5, 2018. FMLA ensures that millions of Americans can access up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for a newborn baby, to deal with personal illness, or to help a sick family member. Since then, dozens of states have expanded on the FMLA to offer more comprehensive paid leave policies, and SiX is proud to support legislators who are committed to expanding strong, meaningful paid leave policies at the state level in 2018.

To see how you can get involved, email info@stateinnovation.org, sign up for email updates from SiX, and stay tuned for more updates in the coming weeks right here on the SiX blog. You can also follow SiX on Facebook and Twitter.

We hope you’ll join us!

- The State Innovation Exchange Team

 

NARAL CO color logo LARGE 1    NWLC   WE logo 355 2017 LP LogoHealth Care Voter logoTHP logo horizontal

  CRR logo    9to5   A Better Balance    AAUW   AROS   CAG   EARN logo primary   EPI   FVAW Logo HiRes JPG indivisible ProgressOhioREALLOGO

SEIUlogoHi Res arizona coalition for change CAP CPD Michigan United NIRH raise the floorAFL CIO

 

Guest Commentary: #GetCoveredNow and Help Get the Word Out

By: Emily Barson, Get America Covered

The deadline to sign up for health insurance is December 15 in most states—just a month away. With new deadlines and a lot of misinformation out there, we need your help to get the word out about open enrollment. Take Action!

This year, the federal government is not interested in getting that word out, so we started Get America Covered to fill in that gap - to help people get covered and stay covered.

The biggest challenge we’re facing this Open Enrollment period is that people don’t know that it’s time to sign up or think that coverage is too expensive and out of reach for them.

That’s where all of us can help. If we are going to cut through the confusion and get the facts out, we need your help. Everyone can help spread the word about a few key facts about Open Enrollment:

We need your help to spread the word.

Can you use your social media and email lists to share enrollment information? Can you mobilize your community to form a street team and spread the word about Open Enrollment in your community?

Open Enrollment is just half the time as in previous years, so we need to make sure people know it’s time to #GetCovered! Download our Open Enrollment toolkit and Best Practices for State Officials now.

Emily Barson is a former Obama Administration official at the Department of Health and Human Services who helped lead outreach efforts around the Affordable Care Act and is now leading outreach efforts at Get America Covered.

Guest Commentary: Georgia Women Deserve Equal Pay

By: Representative Park Cannon, Georgia

I grew up in a single parent home shaped by domestic violence. My mother worked as a pharmaceutical representative to keep us fed. We needed every penny she earned so that we could stay afloat. Many Georgia families know what it’s like to grow up struggling. They understand hardships. They also know, often from deep personal experience, that every family needs employers to pay women what they deserve.

Recent analysis by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) reveals that many women don’t receive a fair day’s pay. Even after all these years, the gender pay gap sits at 20 cents. This means, on average, women working full time take home 80 cents for every dollar men make. In Georgia it’s not much better. On average, women here only make 82 cents for every dollar a man makes.

Black and Latina women face an even larger pay gap. On average, they only make 63 and 54 percent of what white men are paid, respectively. Compared to white women, Black and Latina women are disproportionally more likely to work in low paying but demanding jobs, such as the service industry. This worsens intergenerational poverty, and helps explain why the wealth gap between black and white families continues to grow. How will we ever reach economic parity when black women continue to make less money than we’ve earned? Closing the gender and racial pay gaps is one of the most important civil rights struggles of our generation.

After graduating from college, the pay gap makes it harder for women to pay off their higher average college loan debt. While working, the pay gap makes it more difficult to afford day-to-day expenses. And in retirement women are penalized because they have been unable to save as much or invest in future opportunities. Throughout a woman’s life, this lost income amounts to hundreds of thousands of forgone dollars.

If we do nothing, the gender pay gap won’t close until 2119. That’s too long for families struggling to get by. We need a real solution to end the gender pay gap and help Georgia communities in a meaningful way.

The Georgia Pay Equity Act, a bill I sponsored, would protect Georgia’s women from discrimination. The bill would move us closer to guaranteeing that every woman receives the compensation she deserves. It does this by prohibiting employers from using a job applicant’s prior salary to determine their future pay, and by protecting workers who discuss their earnings from retaliation. Not only will this bill help women to advocate for themselves, but it will enable employers who are trying to do the right thing to actively and meaningfully work to prevent discrimination in their offices. It’s a win-win for workers and employers.

Georgia’s women deserve this law. When I was a child, my family needed these protections. Today, our communities still need them. It is now more important than ever to ensure that your local representatives continue the fight for pay equality. Make sure they are still listening to you by encouraging them in support of the Georgia Pay Equity Act.